Add to ORKGPetitioner desired to display for profit a privately owned submarine. Upon application, he was denied permission to tie up at the New York City docks, and so he obtained permission to use state-owned docks. He petitioned the police commissioner for permission to distribute handbills advertising his display, but because of a New York City ordinance providing that any handbill which was commercial in nature could not be circulated, this was refused. Petitioner then prepared a handbill with commercial matter referring to the display on one side, and on the other side a protest against the city\u27s refusal to allow petitioner to tie up at its docks. Permission to circulate this handbill was refused under the same ordinance, whereupon petitione...
This case note examines the United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals\u27 decision in Linmark Ass...
People v. Bunis, 9 N.Y.2d 1, 210 N.Y.S.2d 505 (1961); People v. Merolla, 9 N.Y.2d 62, 211 N.Y.S.2d 1...
Defendant was charged under a federal statute\u27 with the publication and distribution of a pamphle...
In its efforts to combat gasoline price wars and the fraud that allegedly accompanied them, the City...
The recent decision by the federal district court in the case of Committee for Industrial Organizati...
Excelsior Picture Corporation v. Regents of University, 3 N.Y.2d 237, 165 N.Y.S.2d 42 (1957)
The defendants circulated, on the streets of Milwaukee, hand bills which set forth the political and...
A Chicago municipal ordinance made it unlawful to exhibit any motion picture without first having se...
The extent to which a municipality may regulate or prohibit the distribution of handbills and circul...
The New York Court of Appeals upheld the denial of a license to exhibit the French motion picture L...
The Supreme Court has held that a municipal ordinance construed to forbid sex-designated classified ...
Appellant used sound equipment mounted on his truck to comment on a labor dispute. He was convicted ...
In their famous article on the right of privacy, Warren and Brandeis noted that the common law prote...
The right to a free expression of ideas, without interference from governmental authorities, is inhe...
The distributor of the motion picture Lady Chatterley\u27s Lover applied to the Motion Picture Div...
This case note examines the United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals\u27 decision in Linmark Ass...
People v. Bunis, 9 N.Y.2d 1, 210 N.Y.S.2d 505 (1961); People v. Merolla, 9 N.Y.2d 62, 211 N.Y.S.2d 1...
Defendant was charged under a federal statute\u27 with the publication and distribution of a pamphle...
In its efforts to combat gasoline price wars and the fraud that allegedly accompanied them, the City...
The recent decision by the federal district court in the case of Committee for Industrial Organizati...
Excelsior Picture Corporation v. Regents of University, 3 N.Y.2d 237, 165 N.Y.S.2d 42 (1957)
The defendants circulated, on the streets of Milwaukee, hand bills which set forth the political and...
A Chicago municipal ordinance made it unlawful to exhibit any motion picture without first having se...
The extent to which a municipality may regulate or prohibit the distribution of handbills and circul...
The New York Court of Appeals upheld the denial of a license to exhibit the French motion picture L...
The Supreme Court has held that a municipal ordinance construed to forbid sex-designated classified ...
Appellant used sound equipment mounted on his truck to comment on a labor dispute. He was convicted ...
In their famous article on the right of privacy, Warren and Brandeis noted that the common law prote...
The right to a free expression of ideas, without interference from governmental authorities, is inhe...
The distributor of the motion picture Lady Chatterley\u27s Lover applied to the Motion Picture Div...
This case note examines the United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals\u27 decision in Linmark Ass...
People v. Bunis, 9 N.Y.2d 1, 210 N.Y.S.2d 505 (1961); People v. Merolla, 9 N.Y.2d 62, 211 N.Y.S.2d 1...
Defendant was charged under a federal statute\u27 with the publication and distribution of a pamphle...