Both the Brewery Workers Union and the Teamsters Union, members of the American Federation of Labor, demanded jurisdiction over drivers of brewery wagons and trucks. In 1933, the Federation decided the controversy in favor of the Teamsters Union. The Brewery Workers Union refused to abide by this decision and filed suit for an injunction to restrain the Teamsters Union and the Federation from carrying out the decision. The lower court granted the injunction, construing the certificate of participation granted the Brewery Workers Union by the Federation as giving a contract right of prior and exclusive jurisdiction over the disputed group of workers. Held, the lower court had no jurisdiction to issue the injunction, because a labor dispute u...
Appellant corporation was charged by the United Steelworkers of America with unfair labor practices ...
In San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, the Supreme Court held that the state and federal co...
Plaintiff, a Michigan trucking company subject to the LMRA, brought suit in a Michigan court agains...
Both the Brewery Workers Union and the Teamsters Union, members of the American Federation of Labor,...
Following a breakdown in negotiations over contract extension, plaintiff union, the certified repres...
In cases involving the discipline of union members by a trade union, and the member\u27s right of re...
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargai...
To understand better the tremendous scope of this labyrinthical situation, the following hypothetica...
Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictiona...
The!! National Labor Relations Board proceeded against defendant corporation, which was admittedly e...
Respondent employers refused to enter a union shop agreement with the petitioning unions, who then b...
Plaintiff, an unincorporated labor organization, filed suit in federal district court to enforce a c...
In three recent cases, the United States Supreme Court has been required to determine the impact of ...
This recent case discusses Stryjewski v. Local 830, Brewery Distributor Drivers (Pa. 1967)
The Labor-Management Relations Act gives federal district courts jurisdiction to grant injunctions i...
Appellant corporation was charged by the United Steelworkers of America with unfair labor practices ...
In San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, the Supreme Court held that the state and federal co...
Plaintiff, a Michigan trucking company subject to the LMRA, brought suit in a Michigan court agains...
Both the Brewery Workers Union and the Teamsters Union, members of the American Federation of Labor,...
Following a breakdown in negotiations over contract extension, plaintiff union, the certified repres...
In cases involving the discipline of union members by a trade union, and the member\u27s right of re...
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargai...
To understand better the tremendous scope of this labyrinthical situation, the following hypothetica...
Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictiona...
The!! National Labor Relations Board proceeded against defendant corporation, which was admittedly e...
Respondent employers refused to enter a union shop agreement with the petitioning unions, who then b...
Plaintiff, an unincorporated labor organization, filed suit in federal district court to enforce a c...
In three recent cases, the United States Supreme Court has been required to determine the impact of ...
This recent case discusses Stryjewski v. Local 830, Brewery Distributor Drivers (Pa. 1967)
The Labor-Management Relations Act gives federal district courts jurisdiction to grant injunctions i...
Appellant corporation was charged by the United Steelworkers of America with unfair labor practices ...
In San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, the Supreme Court held that the state and federal co...
Plaintiff, a Michigan trucking company subject to the LMRA, brought suit in a Michigan court agains...