The petitioner was convicted of perjury. The trial judge refused to give the following instruction to the jury: The government must establish the falsity of the statement alleged to have been made by the defendant under oath, by the testimony of two independent witnesses or one witness and corroborating circumstances. Unless that has been done, you must find the defendant not guilty. The petitioner was convicted and the circuit court of appeals affirmed the district court. Held, the refusal of the district judge to instruct the jury as requested was reversible error. Weiler v. United States, (U.S. 1945) 65 S. Ct. 548
Has Washington completely abrogated the common law rule which makes any person convicted of an infam...
New Trials for Technical Errors - A witness called to testify is presumed to be of good character. H...
Defendant was convicted of selling whiskey and imprisoned in the county jail. After the time for app...
The petitioner was convicted of perjury. The trial judge refused to give the following instruction t...
Appellant who was convicted of committing a criminal abortion, moved for a new trial alleging as err...
The testimony given on a trial for murder indicated that the defendant had shot and killed one of hi...
The great majority of jurisdictions in the United States recognize the rule that in civil cases cle...
Perjury has frequently been described as one of the more difficult convictions to obtain, and the tr...
ln an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in 1945, at which time he was a prisoner of ...
On trial in a district court for bribing a federal revenue agent, defendant called five witnesses to...
Petitioner was convicted of murder in the first degree with a recommendation for life imprisonment. ...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
The jury, in an action for trespass, returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and thereafter sep...
This Note examines the question of what standard should be used for granting a new trial when a defe...
Although the early history of the jurata shows it to have been chosen from among those who were fami...
Has Washington completely abrogated the common law rule which makes any person convicted of an infam...
New Trials for Technical Errors - A witness called to testify is presumed to be of good character. H...
Defendant was convicted of selling whiskey and imprisoned in the county jail. After the time for app...
The petitioner was convicted of perjury. The trial judge refused to give the following instruction t...
Appellant who was convicted of committing a criminal abortion, moved for a new trial alleging as err...
The testimony given on a trial for murder indicated that the defendant had shot and killed one of hi...
The great majority of jurisdictions in the United States recognize the rule that in civil cases cle...
Perjury has frequently been described as one of the more difficult convictions to obtain, and the tr...
ln an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in 1945, at which time he was a prisoner of ...
On trial in a district court for bribing a federal revenue agent, defendant called five witnesses to...
Petitioner was convicted of murder in the first degree with a recommendation for life imprisonment. ...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
The jury, in an action for trespass, returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and thereafter sep...
This Note examines the question of what standard should be used for granting a new trial when a defe...
Although the early history of the jurata shows it to have been chosen from among those who were fami...
Has Washington completely abrogated the common law rule which makes any person convicted of an infam...
New Trials for Technical Errors - A witness called to testify is presumed to be of good character. H...
Defendant was convicted of selling whiskey and imprisoned in the county jail. After the time for app...