Add to ORKGPlaintiff, for himself and all other stockholders of R corporation similarly situated, brought action against the directors of the corporation, alleging that they had caused the dismantling and removal of corporate factories and the curtailment of production, that great loss to the corporation had been caused thereby, and that these things were done solely to discourage and punish the corporation\u27s employees by removing hope of re-employment. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The trial court denied the motion. The appellate division reversed, stating that the complaint showed only a reasonable exercise of business judgment. On appeal, held, reversed. The alleged acts amount to actionable br...
This article will analyze the problems raised by the board\u27s attempt to terminate shareholder sui...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a personal action against the president and majority stockholder for f...
The defendants were directors, officers, and sole stockholders of a corporation engaged in the busin...
Plaintiff brought a stockholder\u27s derivative suit against the directors of X corporation, allegin...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
Plaintiff, stockholder in defendant bank, brought a derivative suit against the bank\u27s directors ...
In a derivative suit the plaintiff, a minority stockholder, sought an accounting by officers and dir...
Plaintiff, owner of 50 percent of the stock in a theater corporation, brought a derivative action in...
Plaintiff, a minority stockholder in the Kaiser-Frazer Corporation, objected to the approval by a fe...
In the recent case of United States Lines, Inc. v. United States Lines Co. the plaintiff was a minor...
In a derivative stockholders\u27 suit, the defendant corporation was granted an order for security f...
A shareholder\u27s derivative suit is an equity proceeding instituted by a shareholder on behalf of ...
A derivative suit alleging directors\u27 fraud was brought by a minority shareholder, but there was ...
This Article is premised on the belief that the derivative action is uniquely susceptible to strike ...
Plaintiff, a citizen of New York and the owner of some preferred stock in the defendant Delaware cor...
This article will analyze the problems raised by the board\u27s attempt to terminate shareholder sui...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a personal action against the president and majority stockholder for f...
The defendants were directors, officers, and sole stockholders of a corporation engaged in the busin...
Plaintiff brought a stockholder\u27s derivative suit against the directors of X corporation, allegin...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
Plaintiff, stockholder in defendant bank, brought a derivative suit against the bank\u27s directors ...
In a derivative suit the plaintiff, a minority stockholder, sought an accounting by officers and dir...
Plaintiff, owner of 50 percent of the stock in a theater corporation, brought a derivative action in...
Plaintiff, a minority stockholder in the Kaiser-Frazer Corporation, objected to the approval by a fe...
In the recent case of United States Lines, Inc. v. United States Lines Co. the plaintiff was a minor...
In a derivative stockholders\u27 suit, the defendant corporation was granted an order for security f...
A shareholder\u27s derivative suit is an equity proceeding instituted by a shareholder on behalf of ...
A derivative suit alleging directors\u27 fraud was brought by a minority shareholder, but there was ...
This Article is premised on the belief that the derivative action is uniquely susceptible to strike ...
Plaintiff, a citizen of New York and the owner of some preferred stock in the defendant Delaware cor...
This article will analyze the problems raised by the board\u27s attempt to terminate shareholder sui...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a personal action against the president and majority stockholder for f...
The defendants were directors, officers, and sole stockholders of a corporation engaged in the busin...