Topics
promissory noteAgent
BourneAgent
In an action against the maker of a promissory note by an indorsee thereof, claiming to be a holder in due course, the question was the negotiability of the note. It contained a provision that If the maker or anyone of the makers hereof shall fail to furnish additional security upon the demand of said company, said company is authorized to declare all indebtedness owed to it by the maker or makers hereof immediately due and payable without giving notice of said declaration. Held, the quoted language rendered the note nonnegotiable. American Finance Corp. v. Bourne, 190 Okla. 332, 123 P. (2d) 671 (1942)
The defendant purchased a car from a dealer who represented it to be a new demonstrator. In fact, th...
In an action by the payee against the insane accommodation maker of a promissory note, the court hel...
Bonds of D County gave the holder the option of demanding payment at the office of the county treasu...
In an action against the maker of a promissory note by an indorsee thereof, claiming to be a holder ...
The defendant, acceptor, claimed that the trade acceptance sued upon was non-negotiable. This trade ...
Defendant was sued on a note containing, among other acceleration clauses, a provision that if any h...
A note was made providing for eighteen monthly payments, and on default of any payment, the whole am...
The defendant, at the request of her husband, signed a blank promissory note. After making the note ...
For Mighty King #14468 Saddle Horse was inscribed on the face of the note upon which the plaintiff, ...
On April 12, 1938, M executed a demand promissory note, negotiable in form, payable to the order of ...
Plaintiff, transferee of a promissory note and a conditional sale contract, brought suit on the nego...
Plaintiff finance company followed a policy of refusing to take up negotiable notes from appliance d...
In an action upon a promissory note by a holder who was a transferee after maturity, the maker sough...
Defendant, in payment for goods purchased, drew two checks payable to W which W indorsed pay to ord...
The payee assigned a note and mortgage to the plaintiff by separate paper. The plaintiff sued the pa...
The defendant purchased a car from a dealer who represented it to be a new demonstrator. In fact, th...
In an action by the payee against the insane accommodation maker of a promissory note, the court hel...
Bonds of D County gave the holder the option of demanding payment at the office of the county treasu...
In an action against the maker of a promissory note by an indorsee thereof, claiming to be a holder ...
The defendant, acceptor, claimed that the trade acceptance sued upon was non-negotiable. This trade ...
Defendant was sued on a note containing, among other acceleration clauses, a provision that if any h...
A note was made providing for eighteen monthly payments, and on default of any payment, the whole am...
The defendant, at the request of her husband, signed a blank promissory note. After making the note ...
For Mighty King #14468 Saddle Horse was inscribed on the face of the note upon which the plaintiff, ...
On April 12, 1938, M executed a demand promissory note, negotiable in form, payable to the order of ...
Plaintiff, transferee of a promissory note and a conditional sale contract, brought suit on the nego...
Plaintiff finance company followed a policy of refusing to take up negotiable notes from appliance d...
In an action upon a promissory note by a holder who was a transferee after maturity, the maker sough...
Defendant, in payment for goods purchased, drew two checks payable to W which W indorsed pay to ord...
The payee assigned a note and mortgage to the plaintiff by separate paper. The plaintiff sued the pa...
The defendant purchased a car from a dealer who represented it to be a new demonstrator. In fact, th...
In an action by the payee against the insane accommodation maker of a promissory note, the court hel...
Bonds of D County gave the holder the option of demanding payment at the office of the county treasu...
Add to ORKG