Add to ORKGThe prevailing notion that stare decisis is peculiar to the Anglican Legal System is quite provincial and far from correct. On the contrary, the principle is inherent in every legal system, at least in its primitive stage; for the earliest form of law is custom, and the core of custom is precedent, not necessarily judicial, but something quite as authoritative
This paper examines the obsolescence of mandatory court precedents and its role in the application o...
This Article, a contribution to a symposium on constitutional foundations, maintains that an unappre...
It is worth mentioning that the German legal system is based on the codified law. This system lacks ...
The prevailing notion that stare decisis is peculiar to the Anglican Legal System is quite provincia...
This paper elucidates the common law doctrine of stare decisis and the methodology of using preceden...
This paper demonstrates that reasoning with statutes and reasoning with cases are actually one and t...
Based on various law sources, the American common law is connected by a particular role of prior jud...
Stare decisis remains a controversial feature of the legal systems that recognize it. Some jurists a...
Stare decisis, the rule that judicial precedents should be followed, has been considered by American...
In the United States Supreme Court, the concept of stare decisis operates as both metadoctrine and d...
Based on various law sources, the American common law is connected by a particular role of prior jud...
In a world where circumstances never changed and where every judicial decision was unassailably corr...
The present research aims to address the system of judicial precedents and its applicability in the ...
What happens when valid constitutional precedent, including precedent from our country’s highest cou...
Interpreting and following precedent is a complicated business. Various reasonable but conflicting m...
This paper examines the obsolescence of mandatory court precedents and its role in the application o...
This Article, a contribution to a symposium on constitutional foundations, maintains that an unappre...
It is worth mentioning that the German legal system is based on the codified law. This system lacks ...
The prevailing notion that stare decisis is peculiar to the Anglican Legal System is quite provincia...
This paper elucidates the common law doctrine of stare decisis and the methodology of using preceden...
This paper demonstrates that reasoning with statutes and reasoning with cases are actually one and t...
Based on various law sources, the American common law is connected by a particular role of prior jud...
Stare decisis remains a controversial feature of the legal systems that recognize it. Some jurists a...
Stare decisis, the rule that judicial precedents should be followed, has been considered by American...
In the United States Supreme Court, the concept of stare decisis operates as both metadoctrine and d...
Based on various law sources, the American common law is connected by a particular role of prior jud...
In a world where circumstances never changed and where every judicial decision was unassailably corr...
The present research aims to address the system of judicial precedents and its applicability in the ...
What happens when valid constitutional precedent, including precedent from our country’s highest cou...
Interpreting and following precedent is a complicated business. Various reasonable but conflicting m...
This paper examines the obsolescence of mandatory court precedents and its role in the application o...
This Article, a contribution to a symposium on constitutional foundations, maintains that an unappre...
It is worth mentioning that the German legal system is based on the codified law. This system lacks ...