Cooper, a citizen of New Jersey, was sought as a witness by a defendant in a criminal prosecution in a New York court in accordance with a New Jersey statute, which allowed such a procedure upon certain conditions. The conditions included a hearing in New Jersey on the summons and provisions for compensation and immunity from service of process while acting on the writ outside the state. At the New Jersey hearing on the summons Cooper objected on the ground that the statute was an unconstitutional deprivation of his liberty. Held, that the statute is constitutional. In re Cooper, 127 N. J. 312, 22 A. (2d) 532 (1941)
Besides the two specific problems which the new federal act presents, namely, whether it imposes non...
It is fundamental, even in a federal system, that a state be free to regulate the procedure of its c...
Defendant, not claiming constitutional protection against self-incrimination, refused to testify bef...
Defendant, a witness called by the New Hampshire attorney general in an investigation of subversive ...
ln response to a summons, petitioner appeared to testify before a congressional committee investigat...
In March 1951, defendant, a New York City policeman, was called to testify before a state grand jury...
This Article examines the validity of the conventional wisdom. It draws support for its analysis fro...
The first state to adopt a constitution following the Declaration of Independence (New Jersey, 1776)...
A case has been recently decided by the Supreme Court of Colorado, upon a condition of facts which i...
Defendant appeared before the New Hampshire attorney general, who was authorized by statute to inves...
Petitioner, who was known as an underworld character and racketeer, was subpoenaed before a federal ...
Petitioner was convicted of murder in the first degree with a recommendation for life imprisonment. ...
Modem American law is, in a sense, a system of compartments. For understandable curricular reasons, ...
Petitioner suspected of having robbed five persons on a single occasion. was indicted and tried for ...
Indicted for illegal traffic in narcotics, petitioner and his trial counsel allegedly attempted to f...
Besides the two specific problems which the new federal act presents, namely, whether it imposes non...
It is fundamental, even in a federal system, that a state be free to regulate the procedure of its c...
Defendant, not claiming constitutional protection against self-incrimination, refused to testify bef...
Defendant, a witness called by the New Hampshire attorney general in an investigation of subversive ...
ln response to a summons, petitioner appeared to testify before a congressional committee investigat...
In March 1951, defendant, a New York City policeman, was called to testify before a state grand jury...
This Article examines the validity of the conventional wisdom. It draws support for its analysis fro...
The first state to adopt a constitution following the Declaration of Independence (New Jersey, 1776)...
A case has been recently decided by the Supreme Court of Colorado, upon a condition of facts which i...
Defendant appeared before the New Hampshire attorney general, who was authorized by statute to inves...
Petitioner, who was known as an underworld character and racketeer, was subpoenaed before a federal ...
Petitioner was convicted of murder in the first degree with a recommendation for life imprisonment. ...
Modem American law is, in a sense, a system of compartments. For understandable curricular reasons, ...
Petitioner suspected of having robbed five persons on a single occasion. was indicted and tried for ...
Indicted for illegal traffic in narcotics, petitioner and his trial counsel allegedly attempted to f...
Besides the two specific problems which the new federal act presents, namely, whether it imposes non...
It is fundamental, even in a federal system, that a state be free to regulate the procedure of its c...
Defendant, not claiming constitutional protection against self-incrimination, refused to testify bef...