Defendant, one of the country\u27s largest producers of salt for industrial uses, held patents on two machines for utilization of salt products. It leased these machines on condition that the lessee purchase from defendant all the salt (an unpatented product) to be used with the machines unless salt should become available elsewhere at a lower price. The federal government brought suit under the Sherman and Clayton Acts to enjoin the continued observance of these provisions of the lessee. The district court granted the injunction and ordered that defendant, if offering any machines at all for lease, offer the same to any and all applicants on nondiscriminatory terms. On direct appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, held, affirmed...
The United States Supreme Court, distinguishing between sales and agency transactions, has held that...
Plaintiff, a wholesale and retail dealer in Marathon products, and the smallest wholesale distribu...
Petitioner, Klor\u27s, Inc., a retail electrical appliance store, brought a treble damage action aga...
Defendant, one of the country\u27s largest producers of salt for industrial uses, held patents on tw...
Masonite Corporation, the principal defendant, manufactured and sold for construction purposes a pat...
Two recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court serve to focus attention on the legal limits...
The United States filed a complaint charging that defendants had attempted collusively to fix prices...
Many students of the decisions under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act have voiced the opinion that the Sup...
In 1935, the Attorney General brought a suit in equity to enforce the antitrust laws, charging Colum...
Respondent manufactured and leased patented devices used in the canning industry for depositing salt...
Plaintiff, owning a patent on a process involving the use of unpatented lecithin in the production o...
Petitioner nationally markets its product through exclusive dealing contracts with 80,700 independen...
Plaintiff manufacturer had extensive agreements with its distributors under the Michigan Fair Trade ...
The Sherman Anti-Trust Act declares every contract in restraint of trade to be illegal. The early de...
Defendants\u27 intestate, who owned large interests in two lime companies operating in Washington an...
The United States Supreme Court, distinguishing between sales and agency transactions, has held that...
Plaintiff, a wholesale and retail dealer in Marathon products, and the smallest wholesale distribu...
Petitioner, Klor\u27s, Inc., a retail electrical appliance store, brought a treble damage action aga...
Defendant, one of the country\u27s largest producers of salt for industrial uses, held patents on tw...
Masonite Corporation, the principal defendant, manufactured and sold for construction purposes a pat...
Two recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court serve to focus attention on the legal limits...
The United States filed a complaint charging that defendants had attempted collusively to fix prices...
Many students of the decisions under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act have voiced the opinion that the Sup...
In 1935, the Attorney General brought a suit in equity to enforce the antitrust laws, charging Colum...
Respondent manufactured and leased patented devices used in the canning industry for depositing salt...
Plaintiff, owning a patent on a process involving the use of unpatented lecithin in the production o...
Petitioner nationally markets its product through exclusive dealing contracts with 80,700 independen...
Plaintiff manufacturer had extensive agreements with its distributors under the Michigan Fair Trade ...
The Sherman Anti-Trust Act declares every contract in restraint of trade to be illegal. The early de...
Defendants\u27 intestate, who owned large interests in two lime companies operating in Washington an...
The United States Supreme Court, distinguishing between sales and agency transactions, has held that...
Plaintiff, a wholesale and retail dealer in Marathon products, and the smallest wholesale distribu...
Petitioner, Klor\u27s, Inc., a retail electrical appliance store, brought a treble damage action aga...