Add to ORKGTestator\u27s will devised a tract of land to his three nieces and directed that the nieces should not sell or dispose of the land for twenty years after his death. This provision was incorporated in the decree of the probate court distributing the land to the three nieces. After the decree of distribution had become final, one of the nieces brought the present action for partition. Over the objection that the decree was conclusive and forbade this type of alienation, the trial court ordered partition. On appeal, held, affirmed. The condition restraining alienation for twenty years is forbidden by statute and therefore that part of the decree is void and is not binding on the distributees. Wharton v. Mollinet, (Cal. App. 1951) 229 P. (2d) 8...
In Pemberton v. Hughes the action was brought in England, by one Sarah E. Pemberton claiming to be t...
Testator, plaintiff\u27s father, acquired property in the joint names of himself and his wife by usi...
The United States sued defendant in two counts for violation of OPA price regulations. The first cou...
In a previous action, A, as assignee of a conditional sales contract, sought to recover the property...
Testator, domiciled in California, by his will created a charitable trust of his residuary estate wh...
The complaint alleged that testatrix who had executed a will leaving her whole estate to defendants ...
Plaintiff brought an action in the circuit court against Crane for breach of an alleged trust agreem...
Two heirs at law, by physical force or by creating a disturbance, prevented decedent from executing ...
Should judicial action ever be held void on collateral attack by reason of any departure from the pr...
In a previous action, A, as assignee of a conditional sales contract, sought to recover the property...
Respondent had applied for a determination of petitioner\u27s rights under the New York Decedent Est...
In 1883, the grantor conveyed by warranty deed to A for life, remainder to the heirs of B. A died in...
Appellant originally owned all of a certain tract of land upon which his home was built. In 1942 he ...
Testator\u27s will, executed in 1944, named his wife executrix and sole devisee. One month before hi...
For over a century American courts and text writers have referred to the administration of a deceden...
In Pemberton v. Hughes the action was brought in England, by one Sarah E. Pemberton claiming to be t...
Testator, plaintiff\u27s father, acquired property in the joint names of himself and his wife by usi...
The United States sued defendant in two counts for violation of OPA price regulations. The first cou...
In a previous action, A, as assignee of a conditional sales contract, sought to recover the property...
Testator, domiciled in California, by his will created a charitable trust of his residuary estate wh...
The complaint alleged that testatrix who had executed a will leaving her whole estate to defendants ...
Plaintiff brought an action in the circuit court against Crane for breach of an alleged trust agreem...
Two heirs at law, by physical force or by creating a disturbance, prevented decedent from executing ...
Should judicial action ever be held void on collateral attack by reason of any departure from the pr...
In a previous action, A, as assignee of a conditional sales contract, sought to recover the property...
Respondent had applied for a determination of petitioner\u27s rights under the New York Decedent Est...
In 1883, the grantor conveyed by warranty deed to A for life, remainder to the heirs of B. A died in...
Appellant originally owned all of a certain tract of land upon which his home was built. In 1942 he ...
Testator\u27s will, executed in 1944, named his wife executrix and sole devisee. One month before hi...
For over a century American courts and text writers have referred to the administration of a deceden...
In Pemberton v. Hughes the action was brought in England, by one Sarah E. Pemberton claiming to be t...
Testator, plaintiff\u27s father, acquired property in the joint names of himself and his wife by usi...
The United States sued defendant in two counts for violation of OPA price regulations. The first cou...