(A) Percentage of rejection rates for each offer size across the 60 trials. (B) Visual representation of dynamics of the mean rejection rates (%) throughout the task. Rejection rates were calculated with a sliding window of 5 trials. (C) Comparison of mean rejection rates between Baseline and Post-conditioning blocks (D) Comparisons of Baseline and Post-conditioning rejections rates grouped by offer size. Data are represented as mean ± SEM *p p < 0.01 corrected for multiple comparison when appropriate.</p
<p>(a) An example of a change trial in the retro-cue condition (top panel), simultaneous-cue conditi...
<p>Behavioral accuracies averaged across 14 participants in 3°, 9°, and 15° conditions for the block...
Behavioral results and model fits in Experiments 1(A) and 2 (B). Top: Learning performance (i.e. per...
<p>It is clear that the rejection rates in the three public situations (informed-IG and non-informed...
<p>Behavioral Results: Percentage of Trials in which Advice was Followed and Ignored in each Treatme...
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
<div><p>a. Acceptance rates in percent categorized according the amount of money offered to the subj...
<p>A) Percentage of responses per stimuli category. *difference between responses per category with ...
<p>Mean accuracy (A) and reaction time (B) as a function of response bias condition. (C). Fitted DDM...
<p>Error bars denote the standard error of the mean. * <i>p</i> < .05, ** <i>p</i> < .01.</p
Data are about 106 participants divided in six groups. Groups differed in the kind of trials introdu...
<p>(A) Learning curves: Cumulative sum of correct answers to reward expectations as function of tria...
<p><b>(A)</b> Format analysis: (left) scatterplot of offer 1, epoch 2 regression coefficients for tr...
<p>Left: Correlation between likeability rating and simulation richness (number of details reported ...
<p>(A) Distribution of desirability classifications by stimulus category, averaged over all subjects...
<p>(a) An example of a change trial in the retro-cue condition (top panel), simultaneous-cue conditi...
<p>Behavioral accuracies averaged across 14 participants in 3°, 9°, and 15° conditions for the block...
Behavioral results and model fits in Experiments 1(A) and 2 (B). Top: Learning performance (i.e. per...
<p>It is clear that the rejection rates in the three public situations (informed-IG and non-informed...
<p>Behavioral Results: Percentage of Trials in which Advice was Followed and Ignored in each Treatme...
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
<div><p>a. Acceptance rates in percent categorized according the amount of money offered to the subj...
<p>A) Percentage of responses per stimuli category. *difference between responses per category with ...
<p>Mean accuracy (A) and reaction time (B) as a function of response bias condition. (C). Fitted DDM...
<p>Error bars denote the standard error of the mean. * <i>p</i> < .05, ** <i>p</i> < .01.</p
Data are about 106 participants divided in six groups. Groups differed in the kind of trials introdu...
<p>(A) Learning curves: Cumulative sum of correct answers to reward expectations as function of tria...
<p><b>(A)</b> Format analysis: (left) scatterplot of offer 1, epoch 2 regression coefficients for tr...
<p>Left: Correlation between likeability rating and simulation richness (number of details reported ...
<p>(A) Distribution of desirability classifications by stimulus category, averaged over all subjects...
<p>(a) An example of a change trial in the retro-cue condition (top panel), simultaneous-cue conditi...
<p>Behavioral accuracies averaged across 14 participants in 3°, 9°, and 15° conditions for the block...
Behavioral results and model fits in Experiments 1(A) and 2 (B). Top: Learning performance (i.e. per...