Ultra petita decision practiced under the MK’s jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legislation needs to be assessed carefully. This practice should not be condemned as illegitimate because there is no explicit constitutional rule that guarantee it. The author therefore argues that this practice can be justified under two reasons. First, judicial activism. Second, the very nature of constitutional adjudication in order to defend the supremacy of the constitution over legislation. According to these reasons, the MK’s ultra petita decision should be upheld because this practice is the most reasonable means to protect the constitution
Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah Ultra Petita dalam perkara penguji...
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menganalisis tentang kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi ...
Some issues are existed regarding to Constitutional Court\u27s performance.First, when a statute exa...
Ultra petita decision practiced under the MK's jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legis...
Ultra petita decision practiced under the MK’s jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legis...
The existence of Constitutional Court after the amendment the 1945 Constitution of Republic Indonesi...
The existence of Constitutional Court after the amendment the 1945 Constitution of Republic Indonesi...
Basic considerations of the Constitutional Court made ultra petita verdict was:(a) philosophical r...
Constitutional Court is one of the conductors in Indonesia’s judicial power as regulated by Article ...
Abstract: Indonesia is a constitutional state so that in 2003 the Constitutional Court was born thro...
Albeit the absence of standing for ultra petita verdicts, our Constitutional Court has in several ru...
Albeit the absence of standing for ultra petita verdicts, our Constitutional Court has in several ru...
The Constitutional Court to be the constitutional goalkeeper, there is not anything contrary against...
A transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution call...
A transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution call...
Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah Ultra Petita dalam perkara penguji...
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menganalisis tentang kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi ...
Some issues are existed regarding to Constitutional Court\u27s performance.First, when a statute exa...
Ultra petita decision practiced under the MK's jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legis...
Ultra petita decision practiced under the MK’s jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legis...
The existence of Constitutional Court after the amendment the 1945 Constitution of Republic Indonesi...
The existence of Constitutional Court after the amendment the 1945 Constitution of Republic Indonesi...
Basic considerations of the Constitutional Court made ultra petita verdict was:(a) philosophical r...
Constitutional Court is one of the conductors in Indonesia’s judicial power as regulated by Article ...
Abstract: Indonesia is a constitutional state so that in 2003 the Constitutional Court was born thro...
Albeit the absence of standing for ultra petita verdicts, our Constitutional Court has in several ru...
Albeit the absence of standing for ultra petita verdicts, our Constitutional Court has in several ru...
The Constitutional Court to be the constitutional goalkeeper, there is not anything contrary against...
A transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution call...
A transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution call...
Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah Ultra Petita dalam perkara penguji...
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menganalisis tentang kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi ...
Some issues are existed regarding to Constitutional Court\u27s performance.First, when a statute exa...