Animal property rights theory is an approach to territorial rights in which wild animals are conceived of as owners of the natural spaces they inhabit and use. Its most important proponent is the Australian philosopher John Hadley (2005, 2015, 2017), while other defenders include the philosopher Josh Milburn (2017), the political theorist Steve Cooke (2017), and the lawyer Karen Bradshaw (2018). Though this suggests that the theory is a new approach to thinking about human-animal relationships and preservation of natural spaces, Hadley (2015, 8, 76) identifies the seed of animal property rights theory in influential works of 20th century animal ethics, such as the case for animal rights from Tom Regan (1984). That said, one of the only expl...
Animal protection is socially constructed through laws specifying which animals should be protected ...
Animal protection is socially constructed through laws specifying which animals should be protected ...
This paper argues that it is not necessary to abolish all incidents of animal ownership in order to ...
Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Wild Animals represents the first attempt to ...
The concept of property has been the focus of recent debate in environmental ethics. Proponents of p...
In this chapter, I will explain two contrasting theories of animal property rights (Hadley 2015). Wh...
This new political approach to animal rights is a long-overdue improvement of existing animal rights...
The focus of this paper is on the “right to place” as a political theory of wild animal rights. Out ...
The focus of this paper is on the “right to place” as a political theory of wild animal rights. Out ...
Book review of John Hadley: Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Wild Animals, Lex...
Book review of John Hadley: Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Wild Animals, Lex...
Book review of John Hadley: Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Wild Animals, Lex...
From Introduction: Many philosophers have convincingly argued that non-human animals are worthy of d...
From Introduction: Many philosophers have convincingly argued that non-human animals are worthy of d...
From Introduction: Many philosophers have convincingly argued that non-human animals are worthy of d...
Animal protection is socially constructed through laws specifying which animals should be protected ...
Animal protection is socially constructed through laws specifying which animals should be protected ...
This paper argues that it is not necessary to abolish all incidents of animal ownership in order to ...
Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Wild Animals represents the first attempt to ...
The concept of property has been the focus of recent debate in environmental ethics. Proponents of p...
In this chapter, I will explain two contrasting theories of animal property rights (Hadley 2015). Wh...
This new political approach to animal rights is a long-overdue improvement of existing animal rights...
The focus of this paper is on the “right to place” as a political theory of wild animal rights. Out ...
The focus of this paper is on the “right to place” as a political theory of wild animal rights. Out ...
Book review of John Hadley: Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Wild Animals, Lex...
Book review of John Hadley: Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Wild Animals, Lex...
Book review of John Hadley: Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Wild Animals, Lex...
From Introduction: Many philosophers have convincingly argued that non-human animals are worthy of d...
From Introduction: Many philosophers have convincingly argued that non-human animals are worthy of d...
From Introduction: Many philosophers have convincingly argued that non-human animals are worthy of d...
Animal protection is socially constructed through laws specifying which animals should be protected ...
Animal protection is socially constructed through laws specifying which animals should be protected ...
This paper argues that it is not necessary to abolish all incidents of animal ownership in order to ...