Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Three Different Recent Composite Systems in Large Class II MOD Cavities: an in Vitro Study

Background: For severely mutilated teeth, this research evaluated the most contemporary restorative material. Aim: Repair of Class II MOD cavities in premolars with Ever X posterior in the recent past, Beautifil restorative, and the Universal TetricEevoCream composite systems will be evaluated and compared in this research. “Materials and Methods:” Sixty human maxillary premolars were chosen for the study. As a check, we utilised a group of fifteen healthy teeth (Group 1). The remaining 45 teeth were fitted with MOD cavities of standardised dimensions and randomly assigned to one of three groups (Groups 2, 3, and 4) (n = 15). They used Beautifil restoratives for teeth in Group 2, GC Ever X posterior for teeth in Group 3, Universal Tetric EvoCream for teeth in Group 4. Newtons were used to measure the strength of a material (N). Results: Group 4 exhibited the greatest mean fracture resistance of the four groups, followed by Groups 3, 1, and 2 and finally Group 4. Conclusion: It was found that the Universal Tetric EvoCream composite had the greatest fracture resistance among the test groups. There was a substantial statistical difference between all of the groups. &nbsp