The peopling of Sahul (the combined continent of Australia and New Guinea) represents the earliest continental migration and settlement event of solely anatomically modern humans, but its patterns and ecological drivers remain largely conceptual in the current literature. We present an advanced stochastic-ecological model to test the relative support for scenarios describing where and when the first humans entered Sahul, and their most probable routes of early settlement. The model supports a dominant entry via the northwest Sahul Shelf first, potentially followed by a second entry through New Guinea, with initial entry most consistent with 50,000 or 75,000 years ago based on comparison with bias-corrected archaeological map layers. The mod...
The timing, context and nature of the first people to enter Sahul is still poorly understood owing t...
It is postulated that modern humans speciated in Africa sometime after 300,000 years ago, but most l...
A continental-scale model of Holocene Australian hunter-gatherer demography and mobility is generate...
The peopling of Sahul (the combined continent of Australia and New Guinea) represents the earliest c...
Anatomically Modern Humans (AMHs) dispersed rapidly through island southeast Asia (Sunda and Wallace...
The frst peopling of Sahul (Australia, New Guinea and the Aru Islands joined at lower sea levels) by...
Archaeological data and demographic modelling suggest that the peopling of Sahul required substantia...
pre-print manuscriptThe questions of when and how humans reached Sahul, the Pleistocene continent of...
Archaeological records from Australia provide the earliest, indirect evidence for maritime crossings...
The settlement of Sahul, the lost continent of Oceania, remains one of the most ancient and debated ...
We know it is more than 60,000 years since the first people entered the continent of Sahul — the gia...
Late Pleistocene records of island settlement can shed light on how modern humans (Homo sapiens)adap...
Archaeological records from Australia provide the earliest, indirect evidence for maritime crossings...
Colonisation of Sahul 70-60 thousand years ago (kya) represents the first great maritime migration u...
The timing, context and nature of the first people to enter Sahul is still poorly understood owing t...
It is postulated that modern humans speciated in Africa sometime after 300,000 years ago, but most l...
A continental-scale model of Holocene Australian hunter-gatherer demography and mobility is generate...
The peopling of Sahul (the combined continent of Australia and New Guinea) represents the earliest c...
Anatomically Modern Humans (AMHs) dispersed rapidly through island southeast Asia (Sunda and Wallace...
The frst peopling of Sahul (Australia, New Guinea and the Aru Islands joined at lower sea levels) by...
Archaeological data and demographic modelling suggest that the peopling of Sahul required substantia...
pre-print manuscriptThe questions of when and how humans reached Sahul, the Pleistocene continent of...
Archaeological records from Australia provide the earliest, indirect evidence for maritime crossings...
The settlement of Sahul, the lost continent of Oceania, remains one of the most ancient and debated ...
We know it is more than 60,000 years since the first people entered the continent of Sahul — the gia...
Late Pleistocene records of island settlement can shed light on how modern humans (Homo sapiens)adap...
Archaeological records from Australia provide the earliest, indirect evidence for maritime crossings...
Colonisation of Sahul 70-60 thousand years ago (kya) represents the first great maritime migration u...
The timing, context and nature of the first people to enter Sahul is still poorly understood owing t...
It is postulated that modern humans speciated in Africa sometime after 300,000 years ago, but most l...
A continental-scale model of Holocene Australian hunter-gatherer demography and mobility is generate...