What have been called 'Bayesian confirmation measures' or 'evidential support measures' offer a numerical expression for the impact of a piece of evidence on a judicial hypothesis of interest. The Bayes' factor, sometimes simply called the 'likelihood ratio', represents the best measure of the value of the evidence. It satisfies a number of necessary conditions on normative logical adequacy. It is shown that the same cannot be said for alternative expressions put forward by some legal and forensic quarters. A list of desiderata are given that support the choice of the Bayes' factor as the best measure for quantification of the value of evidence
Measurement of the strength of statistical evidence is a primary objective of statistical analysis t...
Much debate exists between Frequentist and Bayesian methods in statistics. In the evaluation of evid...
27 pages, 12 figures27 pages, 12 figuresWhen presenting forensic evidence, such as a DNA match, expe...
What have been called ‘Bayesian confirmation measures’ or ‘evidential support measures’ offer a nume...
The use of the Bayes factor (BF) or likelihood ratio as a metric to assess the probative value of fo...
AbstractA core aspect of science is using data to assess the degree to which data provide evidence f...
Consider a data set as a body of evidence that might confirm or disconfirm a hypothesis about a para...
Bayes factors quantify the evidence in support of the null (absence of an effect) or the alternative...
This paper deals with a mathematical definition of the strength of evidence in the Bayesian framewor...
Bayesian inference is usually presented as a method for determining how scientific belief should be ...
The law too often avoids or misuses statistical evidence. This problem is partially explained by th...
This paper considers the problem of choosing the sample size for testing hypotheses on the parameter...
Bayesians understand the notion of evidential support in terms of probability raising. Little is kno...
The Bayesian perspective is based on conditioning related to reported evidence that is considered to...
The Bayesian perspective is based on conditioning related to reported evidence that is considered to...
Measurement of the strength of statistical evidence is a primary objective of statistical analysis t...
Much debate exists between Frequentist and Bayesian methods in statistics. In the evaluation of evid...
27 pages, 12 figures27 pages, 12 figuresWhen presenting forensic evidence, such as a DNA match, expe...
What have been called ‘Bayesian confirmation measures’ or ‘evidential support measures’ offer a nume...
The use of the Bayes factor (BF) or likelihood ratio as a metric to assess the probative value of fo...
AbstractA core aspect of science is using data to assess the degree to which data provide evidence f...
Consider a data set as a body of evidence that might confirm or disconfirm a hypothesis about a para...
Bayes factors quantify the evidence in support of the null (absence of an effect) or the alternative...
This paper deals with a mathematical definition of the strength of evidence in the Bayesian framewor...
Bayesian inference is usually presented as a method for determining how scientific belief should be ...
The law too often avoids or misuses statistical evidence. This problem is partially explained by th...
This paper considers the problem of choosing the sample size for testing hypotheses on the parameter...
Bayesians understand the notion of evidential support in terms of probability raising. Little is kno...
The Bayesian perspective is based on conditioning related to reported evidence that is considered to...
The Bayesian perspective is based on conditioning related to reported evidence that is considered to...
Measurement of the strength of statistical evidence is a primary objective of statistical analysis t...
Much debate exists between Frequentist and Bayesian methods in statistics. In the evaluation of evid...
27 pages, 12 figures27 pages, 12 figuresWhen presenting forensic evidence, such as a DNA match, expe...