A Brief Comparison of K-means and Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms on Small Datasets

In this work, the agglomerative hierarchical clustering and K-means clustering algorithms are implemented on small datasets. Considering that the selection of the similarity measure is a vital factor in data clustering, two measures are used in this study - cosine similarity measure and Euclidean distance - along with two evaluation metrics - entropy and purity - to assess the clustering quality. The datasets used in this work are taken from UCI machine learning depository. The experimental results indicate that k-means clustering outperformed hierarchical clustering in terms of entropy and purity using cosine similarity measure. However, hierarchical clustering outperformed k-means clustering using Euclidean distance. It is noted that performance of clustering algorithm is highly dependent on the similarity measure. Moreover, as the number of clusters gets reasonably increased, the clustering algorithms’ performance gets higher