Judicial nominations offer presidents one of their most important and enduring sources of influence. Studying all vacancies in federal district courts from 1961 to 2018, we show that presidents announce nominations to vacant judgeships at systematically faster rates in districts that provided greater electoral support. This pattern emerged most clearly in the last four decades and has strengthened over time. Additional evidence illustrates how presidential nomination strategies have distributional consequences for the courts' institutional capacity. Our results provide suggestive evidence about how the centralization of presidential decision making affects nominations to the federal courts and highlight a mechanism through which the preside...
Using nominations to Article III district and appeals court judgeships, we test a model of senatoria...
This dissertation examines Senate influence on United States Supreme Court nominations during five e...
A central idea in the institutions and development literature is whether the executive is adequately...
Using an original data set of around 70,000 civil rights cases heard by nearly 200 judges, we study ...
The most important appointments a president makes are those to the Supreme Court of the United State...
Spatial models of Supreme Court appointments assume that the president knows the preferences of nomi...
In recent years, presidents have utilized public appeals on behalf of their nominees to the U.S. Cou...
Scholars and politicians who closely track the federal judicial selection process appreciate that co...
Expanding the number of U.S. district judgeships is often justified as a response to expanding casel...
Previous research by Robert Dahl and others has argued that the pre-dominant pattern of Supreme Cour...
Previous empirical research on US Supreme Court nominations has largely overlooked the influence of ...
Presidents play the critical role in determining who will serve as justices on the Supreme Court and...
The Supreme Court nomination and confirmation process has become one of the most contentious aspects...
We analyze the Supreme Court nomination process in order to provide a gen-eral explanation of presid...
We examine whether circuit court judges sacrifice policy purity for career goals. We compare the beh...
Using nominations to Article III district and appeals court judgeships, we test a model of senatoria...
This dissertation examines Senate influence on United States Supreme Court nominations during five e...
A central idea in the institutions and development literature is whether the executive is adequately...
Using an original data set of around 70,000 civil rights cases heard by nearly 200 judges, we study ...
The most important appointments a president makes are those to the Supreme Court of the United State...
Spatial models of Supreme Court appointments assume that the president knows the preferences of nomi...
In recent years, presidents have utilized public appeals on behalf of their nominees to the U.S. Cou...
Scholars and politicians who closely track the federal judicial selection process appreciate that co...
Expanding the number of U.S. district judgeships is often justified as a response to expanding casel...
Previous research by Robert Dahl and others has argued that the pre-dominant pattern of Supreme Cour...
Previous empirical research on US Supreme Court nominations has largely overlooked the influence of ...
Presidents play the critical role in determining who will serve as justices on the Supreme Court and...
The Supreme Court nomination and confirmation process has become one of the most contentious aspects...
We analyze the Supreme Court nomination process in order to provide a gen-eral explanation of presid...
We examine whether circuit court judges sacrifice policy purity for career goals. We compare the beh...
Using nominations to Article III district and appeals court judgeships, we test a model of senatoria...
This dissertation examines Senate influence on United States Supreme Court nominations during five e...
A central idea in the institutions and development literature is whether the executive is adequately...