Add to ORKGDefendant, a department store, signed plaintiff\u27s name without his knowledge or consent to a telegram which it caused to be sent to the governor of Oregon. The telegram urged the veto of a bill which, had it become law, would have prevented defendant from continuing the practice of optometry. Plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for the invasion of his right of privacy. Held, on appeal from the lower court\u27s judgment sustaining defendant\u27s demurrer, that the complaint stated a cause of action. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co., (Ore. I94I) I I3 P. (2d) 438
Petitioner, Aaron Murphy, appeals to the Marshall Supreme Court from a decision affirming the grant ...
Defendants used the name and portrayed the career of one Jack Donahue in a motion picture and exhibi...
In many common law jurisdictions, some or all instances of invasion of privacy constitute a privacy-...
Defendant, a department store, signed plaintiff\u27s name without his knowledge or consent to a tele...
Plaintiff disputed the debt which the defendant corporation asserted against her. Defendant made no ...
To promote the sale of merchandise, defendant retail clothing store mailed a series of postcards to ...
Defendant newspaper published an advertisement containing a picture of plaintiff, a radio artist, in...
In an action for the balance due on account for merchandise purchased defendants counterclaimed for ...
In this moot court competition bench memo, the Supreme Court the state of Marshall has to decide whe...
Defendants, publishing and circulation companies, were not entitled to judgment on pleadings because...
Plaintiff, a chauffeur, had been the victim of a hold-up and shooting, suffering serious injury. Def...
Defendant published plaintiff\u27s photograph in connection with a cosmetics advertisement in a Detr...
Petitioner, Phillip Nevilson, appeals to the Marshall Supreme Court from a decision affirming the gr...
The New York Civil Rights Law prohibits the use of a person\u27s name, portrait, or picture without ...
Plaintiff had been a famous child prodigy in 1910. For twenty-five years he had lived a secluded lif...
Petitioner, Aaron Murphy, appeals to the Marshall Supreme Court from a decision affirming the grant ...
Defendants used the name and portrayed the career of one Jack Donahue in a motion picture and exhibi...
In many common law jurisdictions, some or all instances of invasion of privacy constitute a privacy-...
Defendant, a department store, signed plaintiff\u27s name without his knowledge or consent to a tele...
Plaintiff disputed the debt which the defendant corporation asserted against her. Defendant made no ...
To promote the sale of merchandise, defendant retail clothing store mailed a series of postcards to ...
Defendant newspaper published an advertisement containing a picture of plaintiff, a radio artist, in...
In an action for the balance due on account for merchandise purchased defendants counterclaimed for ...
In this moot court competition bench memo, the Supreme Court the state of Marshall has to decide whe...
Defendants, publishing and circulation companies, were not entitled to judgment on pleadings because...
Plaintiff, a chauffeur, had been the victim of a hold-up and shooting, suffering serious injury. Def...
Defendant published plaintiff\u27s photograph in connection with a cosmetics advertisement in a Detr...
Petitioner, Phillip Nevilson, appeals to the Marshall Supreme Court from a decision affirming the gr...
The New York Civil Rights Law prohibits the use of a person\u27s name, portrait, or picture without ...
Plaintiff had been a famous child prodigy in 1910. For twenty-five years he had lived a secluded lif...
Petitioner, Aaron Murphy, appeals to the Marshall Supreme Court from a decision affirming the grant ...
Defendants used the name and portrayed the career of one Jack Donahue in a motion picture and exhibi...
In many common law jurisdictions, some or all instances of invasion of privacy constitute a privacy-...