This paper articulates in formal terms a crucial distinction concerning future contin- gents, the distinction between what is true about the future and what is reasonable to believe about the future. Its key idea is that the branching structures that have been used so far to model truth can be employed to define an epistemic property, credibility, which we take to be closely related to knowledge and assertibility, and which is ultimately reducible to probability. As a result, two kinds of claims about future contingents—one concerning truth, the other concerning credibility—can be smoothly handled within a single semantic framework
Abstract There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all ...
According to quantum mechanics, statements about the future made by sentient beings like us are, in ...
There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all believe t...
This paper articulates in formal terms a crucial distinction concerning future contingents, the dist...
International audiencePhilosophers have long been concerned with the issue of whether the notions of...
In this article author discusses the problem of the future contingents. He wants to show that the sa...
This paper addresses the question whether future contingents are knowable, that is, whether one can ...
Future contingents are contingent statements about the future — such as future events, actions, stat...
International audienceThe paper defends the thesis that future tensed statements have truth values t...
It is disputed what norm, if any, governs assertion. We address this question by looking at assertio...
It is disputed what norm, if any, governs assertion. We address this question by looking at assertio...
Growing-Block theorists hold that past and present things are real, while future things do not yet e...
International audienceThe aim of this position paper is to outline a unified view of plausible reaso...
Supervaluationism holds that the future is undetermined, and as a consequence of this, statements ab...
Abstract There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all ...
According to quantum mechanics, statements about the future made by sentient beings like us are, in ...
There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all believe t...
This paper articulates in formal terms a crucial distinction concerning future contingents, the dist...
International audiencePhilosophers have long been concerned with the issue of whether the notions of...
In this article author discusses the problem of the future contingents. He wants to show that the sa...
This paper addresses the question whether future contingents are knowable, that is, whether one can ...
Future contingents are contingent statements about the future — such as future events, actions, stat...
International audienceThe paper defends the thesis that future tensed statements have truth values t...
It is disputed what norm, if any, governs assertion. We address this question by looking at assertio...
It is disputed what norm, if any, governs assertion. We address this question by looking at assertio...
Growing-Block theorists hold that past and present things are real, while future things do not yet e...
International audienceThe aim of this position paper is to outline a unified view of plausible reaso...
Supervaluationism holds that the future is undetermined, and as a consequence of this, statements ab...
Abstract There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all ...
According to quantum mechanics, statements about the future made by sentient beings like us are, in ...
There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all believe t...