Surgeons’ Perspective of Decision Making in Recurrent Diverticulitis

Objective:. This study employs qualitative methodology to assess surgeons’ perspective on decision making in management of recurrent diverticulitis to improve patient-centered decision making. Background:. The decision to pursue colectomy for patients with recurrent diverticulitis is nuanced. Strategies to enact broad acceptance of guidelines for surgery are hindered because of a knowledge gap in understanding surgeons’ current attitudes and opinions. Methods:. We performed semistructured interviews with board-certified North American general and colorectal surgeons who manage recurrent diverticulitis. We purposely sampled specialists by both surgeon and practice factors. An iterative inductive/deductive strategy was used to code and analyze the interviews and create a conceptual framework. Results:. Twenty-five surgeons were enrolled over a 9-month period. There was diversity in surgeons’ gender, age, experience, training, specialty (colorectal vs general surgery), and geography. Surgeons described the difficult process to determine who receives an operation. We identified 7 major themes as well as 20 subthemes of the decision-making process. These were organized into a conceptual model. Across the spectrum of interviews, it was notable that there was a move over time from decisions based on counting episodes of diverticulitis to a focus on improving quality of life. Surgeons also felt that quality of life was more dependent on psychosocial factors than the degree of physiological dysfunction. Conclusions:. Surgeons mostly have discarded older dogma in recommending colectomy for recurrent diverticulitis based on number and severity of episodes. Instead, decision making in recurrent diverticulitis is complex, involving multiple surgeon and patient factors and evolving over time. Surgeons struggle with this decision and education- or communication-based interventions that focus on shared decision-making warrant development