Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is a metaphorical concept to describe the self-documented addition of technical debt to a software project in the form of source code comments. SATD can linger in projects and degrade source-code quality, but it can also be more visible than unintentionally added or undocumented technical debt. Understanding the implications of adding SATD to a software project is important because developers can benefit from a better understanding of the quality trade-offs they are making. However, empirical studies, analyzing the survivability and removal of SATD comments, are challenged by potential code changes or SATD comment updates that may interfere with properly tracking their appearance, existence, and removal. ...
Technical debt denotes shortcuts taken during software development, mostly for the sake of expedienc...
Context: Technical debt (TD) contextualizes the problem of pending development tasks as a type of de...
Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is a particular case of Technical Debt (TD) in which developers ...
Technical debt refers to taking shortcuts to achieve short-term goals, which might negatively influe...
Technical debt denotes shortcuts taken during software development, mostly for the sake of expedienc...
Technical debt refers to the phenomena of taking shortcuts to achieve short term gain at the cost of...
Technical debt is a metaphor indicating sub-optimal solutions implemented for short-term benefits by...
Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is a metaphorical concept which describes the self-documented co...
Technical debt refers to taking shortcuts to achieve short-term goals while sacrificing the long-ter...
Technical debt refers to taking shortcuts to achieve short-term goals while sacrificing the long-ter...
In software projects, technical debt metaphor is used to describe the situation where developers and...
Technical Debt is a metaphor used to express sub-optimal source code implementations that are introd...
Developers settle for a non-optimal solution under pressure to meet deadlines and quotas despite the...
Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is when developers intentionally choose to take short-cuts, non-...
Technical debt denotes shortcuts taken during software development, mostly for the sake of expedienc...
Context: Technical debt (TD) contextualizes the problem of pending development tasks as a type of de...
Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is a particular case of Technical Debt (TD) in which developers ...
Technical debt refers to taking shortcuts to achieve short-term goals, which might negatively influe...
Technical debt denotes shortcuts taken during software development, mostly for the sake of expedienc...
Technical debt refers to the phenomena of taking shortcuts to achieve short term gain at the cost of...
Technical debt is a metaphor indicating sub-optimal solutions implemented for short-term benefits by...
Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is a metaphorical concept which describes the self-documented co...
Technical debt refers to taking shortcuts to achieve short-term goals while sacrificing the long-ter...
Technical debt refers to taking shortcuts to achieve short-term goals while sacrificing the long-ter...
In software projects, technical debt metaphor is used to describe the situation where developers and...
Technical Debt is a metaphor used to express sub-optimal source code implementations that are introd...
Developers settle for a non-optimal solution under pressure to meet deadlines and quotas despite the...
Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is when developers intentionally choose to take short-cuts, non-...
Technical debt denotes shortcuts taken during software development, mostly for the sake of expedienc...
Context: Technical debt (TD) contextualizes the problem of pending development tasks as a type of de...
Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is a particular case of Technical Debt (TD) in which developers ...