This paper argues that preparing undergraduate design students for working with complexity, by requiring them to undertake discipline- neutral, indeterminate problems, is altogether manageable, appropriate and additionally, highly impactful on the student’s own practice and conceptualization of design. Key theories that will be introduced include Neil Johnson’s definition of complexity (2003), Richard Buchannan’s description of complexity in design and the corresponding restrictions assumptive design solutions place on innovation (1992), and Barry Wylant’s (2008) characteristations of innovative design practice. In order to exemplify the applicability of the theoretical framework this paper reflects on a complex design project that students...