Disparitas Penuntutan pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Binjai)

Disparity is one of the important topics in the science of criminal law. Disparity, meaning the difference in the amount of punishment given the Public Prosecutor in cases that have the same characteristics. Disparities (disparity: disparity) is essentially the negation of the concept of parity (parity}, which means an equal amount or value. Thus the penalty disparity is inequality between similar crimes (same offense) in conditions or similar circumstances (comparable circumstances). Difference in punishment or sentencing disparity is basically a natural thing because it can be said almost no case that is really the same. Disparity becomes a problem when the range of the sentence imposed differences between similar cases so large, giving rise to injustice and can give rise to suspicions in the community. Disparities in the Criminal (disparity of sentencing) is not the same as the application of criminal offenses against the same (same offense) or the criminal acts that are dangerous to be compared (offenses of comparable seriousness) without clear justification. Based on Law No. 16of 2004 which replaced Law No. 5 of 1991 About the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia is an institution inthe field of prosecution of the main authority of the public prosecutor act prosecution about what is meant by the prosecution as well as the reference to the provisions of Article 1 point 7 and Article 13 7 Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure Code (Criminal Code). Research Methods in writing this thesis carried out by the method of normative law, namely analyzing and searching for answers to the problems raised by the substantive law I legal norms contained in the rules of law, the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA}, the Supreme Court Circular, and etc. Factors that cause the disparity criminal offense namely Legislation Provisions factors, internal factors and external factors. Based on the research conclusions then drawn a suggestion that the Prosecutor as a public prosecutor and a judge, as the termination of the trial would not have too much freedom to decide the case and did not choose the severity of the criminal (strafmaat) to be dropped, as prescribed by law is simply the maximum and minimum , According to the author, that in case of criminal disparity in criminal law is expected to uphold the law fairly as possible for the community as well as the absence of social jealousy among the community. Keywords: Disparities Punishment; Persecution; Punishment System Disparitas pemidanaan merupakan salah satu topik penting dalam ilmu hukum pidana. Disparitas pemidanaan memiliki makna adanya perbedaan besaran hukuman yang diberikan Penuntut Umum dalam perkara-perkara yang memiliki karakteristik yang sama. Disparitas (disparity: disparity) pada dasamya adalah negasi dari konsep paritas (parity) yang artinya kesetaraan jumlah atau nilai. Dengan demikian disparitas adalah ketidaksetaraan hukuman antara kejahatan yang serupa (same offence) dalam kondisi atau situasi serupa (comparable circumstances). Adanya perbedaan dalam pemidanaan hukuman atau disparitas pemidanaan pada dasamya adalah hal yang wajar karena dapat dikatakan hampir tidak ada perkara yang memang benar-benar sama. Disparitas pemidanaan menjadi permasalahan ketika rentang perbedaan hukuman yang dijatuhkan antara perkara serupa sedemikian besar, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakadilan serta dapat menimbulkan kecurigaan-kecurigaan di masyarakat. Disparitas Pidana (disparity of sentencing) adalah penerapan pidana yang tidak sama terhadap tindak pidana yang sama (same offence) atau terhadap tindak pidana yang sifatnya berbahayanya dapat diperbandingkan (offences of comparable seriousness) tanpa dasar pembenaran yang jelas. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 yang menggantikan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1991 Tentang Kejaksaa.1 Republik Indonesia merupakan lembaga di bidang penuntutan wewenang utama Penuntut Umum melakukan tindakan penuntutan tentang apa yang dimaksud dengan penuntutan serta merujuk pada ketentuan Pasal 1 butir 7 dan Pasal 137 Undang-undang No.8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Metode Penelitian dalam penulisan tesis ini dilakukan dcngan metode hukum normatif, yaitu menganalisa dan mencari jawaban atas permasalahan yang diangkat berdasarkan substansi hukum norma-norma hukum yang termuat dalam aturan perundang-undangan, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA), Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung, dan lain-lain. Faktor-faktor penyebab terjadinya disparitas tindak pidana yaitu Faktor Ketentuan Perundang-undangan, faktor internal dan faktor ekstemal. Berdasarkan kesimpulan penelitian maka ditarik suatu saran bahwa pada Jaksa sebagai Penuntut Umum dan Hakim sebagai pemutusan persidangan kiranya tidak mempunyai kebebasan yang berlebihan untuk memutuskan perkara serta tidak memilih beratnya pidana (strafmaat) yang akan dijatuhkan, sebab yang ditentukan oleh undang-undang hanyalah maksimum dan minimumnya. Menurut hemat penulis bahwa dalam hal adanya disparitas pidana dalam hukum pidana diharapkan agar menegakkan hukum yang seadiladilnya bagi masyarakat serta tidak adanya kecemburuan sosial dikalangan masyarakatDisparity is one of the important topics in the science of criminal law. Disparity, meaning the difference in the amount of punishment given the Public Prosecutor in cases that have the same characteristics. Disparities (disparity: disparity) is essentially the negation of the concept of parity (parity}, which means an equal amount or value. Thus the penalty disparity is inequality between similar crimes (same offense) in conditions or similar circumstances (comparable circumstances). Difference in punishment or sentencing disparity is basically a natural thing because it can be said almost no case that is really the same. Disparity becomes a problem when the range of the sentence imposed differences between similar cases so large, giving rise to injustice and can give rise to suspicions in the community. Disparities in the Criminal (disparity of sentencing) is not the same as the application of criminal offenses against the same (same offense) or the criminal acts that are dangerous to be compared (offenses of comparable seriousness) without clear justification. Based on Law No. 16of 2004 which replaced Law No. 5 of 1991 About the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia is an institution inthe field of prosecution of the main authority of the public prosecutor act prosecution about what is meant by the prosecution as well as the reference to the provisions of Article 1 point 7 and Article 13 7 Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure Code (Criminal Code). Research Methods in writing this thesis carried out by the method of normative law, namely analyzing and searching for answers to the problems raised by the substantive law I legal norms contained in the rules of law, the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA}, the Supreme Court Circular, and etc. Factors that cause the disparity criminal offense namely Legislation Provisions factors, internal factors and external factors. Based on the research conclusions then drawn a suggestion that the Prosecutor as a public prosecutor and a judge, as the termination of the trial would not have too much freedom to decide the case and did not choose the severity of the criminal (strafmaat) to be dropped, as prescribed by law is simply the maximum and minimum , According to the author, that in case of criminal disparity in criminal law is expected to uphold the law fairly as possible for the community as well as the absence of social jealousy among the communit