Add to ORKGNPR\u27s Ayesha Rascoe speaks with professor Neal Devins of William & Mary Law School about whether federal judges side with the presidents who appoint them
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.This Article identifies and measures dimensions...
I have twice been nominated to the federal bench by President Clinton. The first nomination, in Dece...
We find field evidence for what experimental studies have documented regarding the contexts and char...
Do people believe a federal court when it rules against the government? And does such judicial credi...
This paper argues that the expansion of the White House\u27s role in judicial appointments since the...
Despite the widespread perception that judges are not political beings and should rule in an imparti...
Principles of apoliticality and personal disinterestedness subtend the American judiciary’s claims t...
U.S. Presidential elections polarize U.S. Courts of Appeals judges, doubling their dissents, partisa...
The inauguration of President Bill Clinton, who will appoint more than three hundred new federal jud...
Although there has been an explosion of empirical legal scholarship about the federal judiciary, wit...
Redistricting cases offer a unique opportunity to test the effects of partisan favoritism in judging...
The legitimacy of the American federal judiciary stems from its role as the non-political branch of ...
This Article critically examines the existing social science evidence on the relative importance of ...
For many decades, the United States has been conducting an extraordinary natural experiment: Randoml...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.This Article identifies and measures dimensions...
I have twice been nominated to the federal bench by President Clinton. The first nomination, in Dece...
We find field evidence for what experimental studies have documented regarding the contexts and char...
Do people believe a federal court when it rules against the government? And does such judicial credi...
This paper argues that the expansion of the White House\u27s role in judicial appointments since the...
Despite the widespread perception that judges are not political beings and should rule in an imparti...
Principles of apoliticality and personal disinterestedness subtend the American judiciary’s claims t...
U.S. Presidential elections polarize U.S. Courts of Appeals judges, doubling their dissents, partisa...
The inauguration of President Bill Clinton, who will appoint more than three hundred new federal jud...
Although there has been an explosion of empirical legal scholarship about the federal judiciary, wit...
Redistricting cases offer a unique opportunity to test the effects of partisan favoritism in judging...
The legitimacy of the American federal judiciary stems from its role as the non-political branch of ...
This Article critically examines the existing social science evidence on the relative importance of ...
For many decades, the United States has been conducting an extraordinary natural experiment: Randoml...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.This Article identifies and measures dimensions...
I have twice been nominated to the federal bench by President Clinton. The first nomination, in Dece...
We find field evidence for what experimental studies have documented regarding the contexts and char...