In its judgement in the case of Austria v. Germany, the Court of Justice of the EU found the new German motorway financing scheme to be in breach of EU law, namely Articles 18, 34, 56 and 92 TFEU. This decision is noteworthy in several regards. It is a snub for the Commission, which had previously decided to terminate its infringement procedure against Germany. It provides guidance for Member States wishing to reform some of their tax arrangements according to the ‘user pays’ and ‘polluter pays’ principles. Finally, it raises interesting questions regarding the application of Article 34 TFEU to fiscal measures
The paper examines the possible opening of an infringement procedure against Germany as a result of ...
The blog addresses the question whether the CJEU does not stretch its competence too much by decidin...
The German States of Schleswig-Holstein and Meckelnburg-Vorpommern seem to have failed to enforce a ...
In its judgement in the case of Austria v. Germany, the Court of Justice of the EU found the new Ger...
Contains fulltext : 162131pub.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)The Europe...
The defendant company had transported goods to Germany, but under conditions of transport that had d...
The Community law principle of free movement of persons entails a broad prohibition of discriminatio...
On December 12, 2002 the European Court of Justice delivered a verdict in Lankhorst-Hohorst GmbH cas...
By its appeal, the Commission of the European Communities seeked to have set aside the judgment of t...
On April 2, 2020, the Court of Justice delivered the judgement on the infringement procedure started...
The European Court of Justice (hereinafter the ‘CJEU’ or the ‘Court’) has developed a judicial appro...
On 28 January 2016 the European Court of Human Rights declared the complaint by the regional Frisian...
The question at hand is located at the intersection of EU law and national constitutional law, and a...
This article pursues the goal to highlight, through some case law examples, the role of the ECJ, whi...
The relationship between the European Union (EU) and its member states has recently been the subject...
The paper examines the possible opening of an infringement procedure against Germany as a result of ...
The blog addresses the question whether the CJEU does not stretch its competence too much by decidin...
The German States of Schleswig-Holstein and Meckelnburg-Vorpommern seem to have failed to enforce a ...
In its judgement in the case of Austria v. Germany, the Court of Justice of the EU found the new Ger...
Contains fulltext : 162131pub.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)The Europe...
The defendant company had transported goods to Germany, but under conditions of transport that had d...
The Community law principle of free movement of persons entails a broad prohibition of discriminatio...
On December 12, 2002 the European Court of Justice delivered a verdict in Lankhorst-Hohorst GmbH cas...
By its appeal, the Commission of the European Communities seeked to have set aside the judgment of t...
On April 2, 2020, the Court of Justice delivered the judgement on the infringement procedure started...
The European Court of Justice (hereinafter the ‘CJEU’ or the ‘Court’) has developed a judicial appro...
On 28 January 2016 the European Court of Human Rights declared the complaint by the regional Frisian...
The question at hand is located at the intersection of EU law and national constitutional law, and a...
This article pursues the goal to highlight, through some case law examples, the role of the ECJ, whi...
The relationship between the European Union (EU) and its member states has recently been the subject...
The paper examines the possible opening of an infringement procedure against Germany as a result of ...
The blog addresses the question whether the CJEU does not stretch its competence too much by decidin...
The German States of Schleswig-Holstein and Meckelnburg-Vorpommern seem to have failed to enforce a ...