The critical role of peer reviewers in the publishing process is examined. Examples of typical challenges are provided including the relative lack of rewards for this important task. Particular attention is paid to the need to consider diversity of the peer reviewers recruited along with impediments to the selection beyond Areas of Competence, often due to the small available pool. Recommendations for improvement are suggested
The peer review process is the dominant system adopted in science to evaluate the quality of article...
Stakeholders might have diverging or conflicting expectations about the functions that peer review s...
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
et al.Peer review is pivotal to science and academia, as it represents a widely accepted strategy fo...
Peer review of manuscripts is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Individual reviewers might feel t...
Ever-increasing numbers of manuscripts, grant proposals, working group documents, position papers, e...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
Peer reviewing is unquestionably the cornerstone of scholarly activity. It is universally seen as on...
ABSTRACT—The present article focuses on ways to make the peer-review and editorial process more effi...
International audienceBACKGROUND:Although peer reviewers play a key role in the manuscript review pr...
The peer review process is the dominant system adopted in science to evaluate the quality of article...
Stakeholders might have diverging or conflicting expectations about the functions that peer review s...
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
et al.Peer review is pivotal to science and academia, as it represents a widely accepted strategy fo...
Peer review of manuscripts is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Individual reviewers might feel t...
Ever-increasing numbers of manuscripts, grant proposals, working group documents, position papers, e...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
Peer reviewing is unquestionably the cornerstone of scholarly activity. It is universally seen as on...
ABSTRACT—The present article focuses on ways to make the peer-review and editorial process more effi...
International audienceBACKGROUND:Although peer reviewers play a key role in the manuscript review pr...
The peer review process is the dominant system adopted in science to evaluate the quality of article...
Stakeholders might have diverging or conflicting expectations about the functions that peer review s...
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...