The article considers whether it is time to reconsider the line between charity and political activities. The law states that to be a charity, an organisation must have exclusively charitable purposes and satisfy the requirement of public benefit. However, the rule against political activity forces organisations to be overly cautious in their campaigning in order to avoid the possibility of losing their charitable status. The article argues for a more robust legal framework which acknowledges that there is no need for special rules relating to political objectives and that trusts for political purposes should be determined in the ordinary way by the test of public benefit
The shackles that bound New Zealand to the political purpose doctrine, the notorious doctrine found ...
This has been a much awaited decision and marks the end of a long journey with regard to matters rel...
This thesis considers the problems (legal and non-legal) which arise in 'political' campaigning acti...
This article considers the turbulent relationship of charities and politics and debates whether ther...
Conference Theme: Democratization, Marketization, and the Third SectorIn common law jurisdictions, i...
For many decades case law and, more recently, statute has determined that a trust will be denied cha...
Federal law significantly limits the political activities of charities, but no one really knows why....
This article discusses to what extent charities are permitted to influence public opinion, seek to c...
Introduction\ud \ud In 1952 the Nathan report stated that:\ud \ud Some of the most valuable activiti...
Historically a trust will be denied charitable status if its purposes are political, although this p...
This article argues that legislation that provide special rules is not necessary because the busin...
The fear for charities of being on the wrong side of the law when it comes to campaigning has always...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission makes a Supreme Court...
The article explores the interaction between legal and political strategy in producing social change...
The shackles that bound New Zealand to the political purpose doctrine, the notorious doctrine found ...
This has been a much awaited decision and marks the end of a long journey with regard to matters rel...
This thesis considers the problems (legal and non-legal) which arise in 'political' campaigning acti...
This article considers the turbulent relationship of charities and politics and debates whether ther...
Conference Theme: Democratization, Marketization, and the Third SectorIn common law jurisdictions, i...
For many decades case law and, more recently, statute has determined that a trust will be denied cha...
Federal law significantly limits the political activities of charities, but no one really knows why....
This article discusses to what extent charities are permitted to influence public opinion, seek to c...
Introduction\ud \ud In 1952 the Nathan report stated that:\ud \ud Some of the most valuable activiti...
Historically a trust will be denied charitable status if its purposes are political, although this p...
This article argues that legislation that provide special rules is not necessary because the busin...
The fear for charities of being on the wrong side of the law when it comes to campaigning has always...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission makes a Supreme Court...
The article explores the interaction between legal and political strategy in producing social change...
The shackles that bound New Zealand to the political purpose doctrine, the notorious doctrine found ...
This has been a much awaited decision and marks the end of a long journey with regard to matters rel...
This thesis considers the problems (legal and non-legal) which arise in 'political' campaigning acti...