Por el consentimiento informado: el derecho a la información

Objective: To know how the relationship between the clinic n and the patient is in providing the in- formation that concerns the health of the user, taking into account the Right of Information. Design: Bibliographic review. Materials and Methods: The search included publications that it did not exceed then years of age and whose complete text was found, focusing on systematic reviews. The search for updated systematic reviews in the chosen field of study through: The Cochrane Library Plus, Pubmed Health, Metabuscadores such as Trip, Bibliographic databases such as CUIDEN PubMed and other sources such as Google academic and magazines. The selected studies were previously submitted to a critical reading skills program (CASPe), whose scores were higher than seven. Fundamental Results: Information is a process, it is about dialogue, this information and obtaining informed consent can vary among patients, it is easy and fast in some cases and in others it may take time. The clinician sho- uld provide time for the patient to assimilate the information and express the doubts and questions that arise. Therefore, the clinician should strive during the dialogue, communicating and informing, to shape and see the limits of the process and clarify the consent of the patient. Conclusions: It is a commit- ment to Bioethics, on the part of all the clinicians involved in health care, to assume the commitment of philosophical reflection on all those ethical dilemmas that arise in daily practice. Communication should be a basic tool for the relationship between the clinician and the patient, and then used in moral deliberation. The clinician should encourage continuous exploration of his pa- tient without giving anything for granted, identify the concerns that the patient may be experiencing, encourage the empathic attitude, act from the congruence and provide the creation of a therapeutic link