This paper investigates the possibility of resolving normative conflicts between the European Convention of Human Rights and the UN Charter through the equivalent protection doctrine, as recently ruled by the European Court of Human Rights (2nd Section) in the Al-Dulimi case. After a brief survey of the relevant case law, the author holds that this is not a suitable solution, since it is prevented by the Article 103 of the Charter. Conversely, the European Court should give priority to Security Council resolutions as long as they are given in accordance to the purposes and principles of the United Nations
The essay deals with the principle of the widest protection, with special reference to art. 53 of th...
The objective of this paper is to analyze procedural divergences between the Court of Justice of the...
In the last few years there has been a significant quantitative increase in requesting interim measu...
This paper investigates the possibility of resolving normative conflicts between the European Conven...
The UN Security Council's practice of targeted sanctions has resulted in serious limitations on the ...
The article is aimed at analysing the issue of interpretation of international obligations arising f...
The article first analyzes the case-law of the European Court of Human rights in relation to the Eur...
This contribution identifies and examines three approaches of the European courts to application of ...
The author examines how the European Court of Human Rights may\ud effectively respond to human right...
The article deals with the problem of the relationship between the European Arrest Warrant and the ...
The purpose of this article is to analyze the relations between the European Convention on Human Rig...
The decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v....
In Al-Jedda v. United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights addressed the petition of a person...
The current debate on the old principle of responsibility to protect those peoples and groups which ...
In its judgment of 30 June 2005 in the case of Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim ¸ Sir...
The essay deals with the principle of the widest protection, with special reference to art. 53 of th...
The objective of this paper is to analyze procedural divergences between the Court of Justice of the...
In the last few years there has been a significant quantitative increase in requesting interim measu...
This paper investigates the possibility of resolving normative conflicts between the European Conven...
The UN Security Council's practice of targeted sanctions has resulted in serious limitations on the ...
The article is aimed at analysing the issue of interpretation of international obligations arising f...
The article first analyzes the case-law of the European Court of Human rights in relation to the Eur...
This contribution identifies and examines three approaches of the European courts to application of ...
The author examines how the European Court of Human Rights may\ud effectively respond to human right...
The article deals with the problem of the relationship between the European Arrest Warrant and the ...
The purpose of this article is to analyze the relations between the European Convention on Human Rig...
The decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v....
In Al-Jedda v. United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights addressed the petition of a person...
The current debate on the old principle of responsibility to protect those peoples and groups which ...
In its judgment of 30 June 2005 in the case of Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim ¸ Sir...
The essay deals with the principle of the widest protection, with special reference to art. 53 of th...
The objective of this paper is to analyze procedural divergences between the Court of Justice of the...
In the last few years there has been a significant quantitative increase in requesting interim measu...