A recent literature provides new evidence that school resources are important for student outcomes. This paper examines whether school accountability systems that incentivize performance (such as No Child Left Behind) raise the efficiency with which additional resources get spent. We leverage the timing of school finance reforms to compare funding impacts on student test scores between states that had accountability in place at the time of the reform and states that did not. The results show that finance-reform-induced increases in student performance are driven by those states where the reform was accompanied by the presence of test-based accountability
High stakes accountability (HSA) reforms were enacted in state after state and federally through the...
Most schools in America use standardized tests to determine how students do on average based on thei...
Spurred by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, virtually every educational reform program now incl...
In recent years, most states have constructed elaborate accountability systems using school-level te...
This paper examines whether school districts, and individual schools, respond to ratings from the ac...
The state of Michigan radically altered its school finance system in 1994. This was a legislature-le...
The recent federal education bill, No Child Left Behind, requires states to test students in grades ...
We examine national trends in educational funding, test score outcomes, and productivity as well as ...
The achievement gap between rich and poor students in the United States is large and growing. On ave...
Although the federal No Child Left Behind program judges the effectiveness of schools based on their...
This mixed-methods dissertation uses benchmark data to explore how schools in a large urban district...
Abstract: This paper examines whether minimum competency school accountability systems, such as tho...
In 2001, Congress enacted the No Child Left Behind Act, with the aims of improving student’s academi...
Pressure for increased school accountability is a distinctive hallmark of the present period of educ...
University of Michigan and the RAND Corporation provided a number of helpful suggestions. Robert Gib...
High stakes accountability (HSA) reforms were enacted in state after state and federally through the...
Most schools in America use standardized tests to determine how students do on average based on thei...
Spurred by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, virtually every educational reform program now incl...
In recent years, most states have constructed elaborate accountability systems using school-level te...
This paper examines whether school districts, and individual schools, respond to ratings from the ac...
The state of Michigan radically altered its school finance system in 1994. This was a legislature-le...
The recent federal education bill, No Child Left Behind, requires states to test students in grades ...
We examine national trends in educational funding, test score outcomes, and productivity as well as ...
The achievement gap between rich and poor students in the United States is large and growing. On ave...
Although the federal No Child Left Behind program judges the effectiveness of schools based on their...
This mixed-methods dissertation uses benchmark data to explore how schools in a large urban district...
Abstract: This paper examines whether minimum competency school accountability systems, such as tho...
In 2001, Congress enacted the No Child Left Behind Act, with the aims of improving student’s academi...
Pressure for increased school accountability is a distinctive hallmark of the present period of educ...
University of Michigan and the RAND Corporation provided a number of helpful suggestions. Robert Gib...
High stakes accountability (HSA) reforms were enacted in state after state and federally through the...
Most schools in America use standardized tests to determine how students do on average based on thei...
Spurred by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, virtually every educational reform program now incl...