During the 1990s and 2000s, nearly every state revised its laws or adopted new legislation facilitating the transfer of juvenile offenders from juvenile court to criminal court. Previously, transfer was reserved for the “worst juveniles”, or those youths who were charged with serious violent offenses. This paper compares and contrasts girls and boys who were judicially waived to adult court in one state from 1994 to 2000. These data suggest that there may be other factors that influence judicial decision-making on the issue of transfer. Policy considerations are also discussed
DRAWING ON SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS OF JUDICIAL WAIVER ADMINISTRATION IN MI...
Over the past few decades, various forms of waiver have become increasingly used at the state level....
This article examined the effect that limiting police discretion regarding juvenile court referrals ...
During the 1990s and 2000s, nearly every state revised its laws or adopted new legislation facilitat...
In 1994, Florida made three changes to its law that expanded its ability to transfer or waive juveni...
Legislative waivers excluding youths from juvenile court have expanded. Meyers studied data on 557 y...
Since the 1960s, recurring cycles of political activism over youth crime have motivated efforts to r...
Prior research has investigated the treatment of transferred juveniles in adultcourt compared to sim...
Rising juvenile crime rates over three decades spurred legal mobilizations within many state legisla...
Much of the research on juvenile transfer to adult court examines the predictors of the waiver decis...
There is an ongoing debate over the legality and effectiveness of the use of judicial waiver as a to...
Changes in juvenile law and juvenile court procedure are slowly dis-mantling the jurisdictional bord...
There are two principal mechanisms for transferring juvenile offenders to the adult criminal justice...
In the past two decades, nearly every state has expanded its authority and simplified its procedures...
Within the past decade, nearly every state has amended its juvenile code in response to perceived in...
DRAWING ON SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS OF JUDICIAL WAIVER ADMINISTRATION IN MI...
Over the past few decades, various forms of waiver have become increasingly used at the state level....
This article examined the effect that limiting police discretion regarding juvenile court referrals ...
During the 1990s and 2000s, nearly every state revised its laws or adopted new legislation facilitat...
In 1994, Florida made three changes to its law that expanded its ability to transfer or waive juveni...
Legislative waivers excluding youths from juvenile court have expanded. Meyers studied data on 557 y...
Since the 1960s, recurring cycles of political activism over youth crime have motivated efforts to r...
Prior research has investigated the treatment of transferred juveniles in adultcourt compared to sim...
Rising juvenile crime rates over three decades spurred legal mobilizations within many state legisla...
Much of the research on juvenile transfer to adult court examines the predictors of the waiver decis...
There is an ongoing debate over the legality and effectiveness of the use of judicial waiver as a to...
Changes in juvenile law and juvenile court procedure are slowly dis-mantling the jurisdictional bord...
There are two principal mechanisms for transferring juvenile offenders to the adult criminal justice...
In the past two decades, nearly every state has expanded its authority and simplified its procedures...
Within the past decade, nearly every state has amended its juvenile code in response to perceived in...
DRAWING ON SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS OF JUDICIAL WAIVER ADMINISTRATION IN MI...
Over the past few decades, various forms of waiver have become increasingly used at the state level....
This article examined the effect that limiting police discretion regarding juvenile court referrals ...