While the earliest deadline first algorithm is known to be optimal as a uniprocessor scheduling policy, the implementation comes at a cost in terms of complexity. Fixed task-priority algorithms on the other hand have lower complexity but higher likelihood of task sets being declared unschedulable, when compared to earliest deadline first (EDF). Various attempts have been undertaken to increase the chances of proving a task set schedulable with similar low complexity. In some cases, this was achieved, by modifying applications to limit preemptions, at the cost of flexibility. In this work we explore several variants of a concept to limit interference by locking down the ready queue at certain instances. The aim is to increase the prospects o...