In recent years, the international scientific community has been rocked by a number of serious cases of research misconduct. In one of these, Woo Suk Hwang, a Korean stem cell researcher published two articles on research with ground-breaking results in Science in 2004 and 2005. Both articles were later revealed to be fakes. This paper provides an overview of what research misconduct is generally understood to be, its manifestations and the extent to which they are thought to exist
Pursuant to the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the United States Department of Health and Hum...
This article works with the figure of the “modest witness” and the concept of “virtual witnessing” t...
Scientists who have come face to face with scientific misconduct consider its consequences years lat...
In 2006 Hwang’s fraudulent papers published in Science on stem cell research re-opened the debate on...
One of the important feature of scientific research is scrutinizing truth. Investigators strive for ...
Now that most of the smoke has cleared from the South Korean human embryonic stem cell fraud, it is ...
Researchers’ integrity is of the important roles as a responsible researcher as their main job scope...
For more than 25 years, research misconduct (research fraud) is defined as fabrication, falsificatio...
Research misconduct in biomedical research attracts significant concern in Korea. Biomedical researc...
The case of Dr. Hwang Woo Suk, the South Korean stem-cell researcher, is arguably the highest profil...
© SAGE PublicationsThe meteoric rise of Professor Wu Sook Hwang who had claimed to have successfully...
The scandal of the “biotechnology evangelist” erupted in Korea at the beginning of the new year: a c...
In the emerging context of the knowledge economy, exploring how both the global economic environment...
This article discusses the responsible conduct of research, questionable research practices, and res...
The purpose of this article is to comment upon an interesting gap in the criticism heaped upon Woo S...
Pursuant to the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the United States Department of Health and Hum...
This article works with the figure of the “modest witness” and the concept of “virtual witnessing” t...
Scientists who have come face to face with scientific misconduct consider its consequences years lat...
In 2006 Hwang’s fraudulent papers published in Science on stem cell research re-opened the debate on...
One of the important feature of scientific research is scrutinizing truth. Investigators strive for ...
Now that most of the smoke has cleared from the South Korean human embryonic stem cell fraud, it is ...
Researchers’ integrity is of the important roles as a responsible researcher as their main job scope...
For more than 25 years, research misconduct (research fraud) is defined as fabrication, falsificatio...
Research misconduct in biomedical research attracts significant concern in Korea. Biomedical researc...
The case of Dr. Hwang Woo Suk, the South Korean stem-cell researcher, is arguably the highest profil...
© SAGE PublicationsThe meteoric rise of Professor Wu Sook Hwang who had claimed to have successfully...
The scandal of the “biotechnology evangelist” erupted in Korea at the beginning of the new year: a c...
In the emerging context of the knowledge economy, exploring how both the global economic environment...
This article discusses the responsible conduct of research, questionable research practices, and res...
The purpose of this article is to comment upon an interesting gap in the criticism heaped upon Woo S...
Pursuant to the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the United States Department of Health and Hum...
This article works with the figure of the “modest witness” and the concept of “virtual witnessing” t...
Scientists who have come face to face with scientific misconduct consider its consequences years lat...
DOI
Add to ORKG