It is well-known that in finite strategic games true common belief (or common knowledge) of rationality implies that the players will choose only strategies that survive the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies. We establish a general theorem that deals with monotonic rationality notions and arbitrary strategic games and allows to strengthen the above result to arbitrary games, other rationality notions, and transfinite iterations of the elimination process. We also clarify what conclusions one can draw for the customary dominance notions that are not monotonic. The main tool is Tarski’s Fixpoint Theorem
Two natural strategy elimination procedures have been studied for strategic games. The first one inv...
Rational decisions depend on what players know, hence an appropriate epistemic analysis is an integr...
AbstractIf a finite strategic game is strictly dominance solvable, then every simultaneous best resp...
It is well-known that in finite strategic games true common belief (or common knowledge) of rational...
In the context of strategic games, we provide an axiomatic proof of the statement "Common knowledge ...
We provide here an epistemic analysis of arbitrary strategic games based on the possibility correspo...
textabstractWe provide here an epistemic analysis of arbitrary strategic games based on the possibil...
Abstract. The epistemic conditions of “rationality and common belief of ra-tionality ” and “rational...
We consider strategic-form games with ordinal payoffs and provide a syntactic analysis of common bel...
The concept of strict dominance provides a technique that can be used normatively to predict the pla...
International audienceWe propose some variants of a multi-modal of joint action, preference and know...
We propose some variants of a multi-modal of joint action, preference and knowledge that support rea...
In his dissertation of 1950, Nash based his concept of the solution to a game on the assumption that...
In this paper we focus on dynamic games with almost perfect information, that is, at every stage som...
We study games in the presence of an interaction structure, which allows players to communicate thei...
Two natural strategy elimination procedures have been studied for strategic games. The first one inv...
Rational decisions depend on what players know, hence an appropriate epistemic analysis is an integr...
AbstractIf a finite strategic game is strictly dominance solvable, then every simultaneous best resp...
It is well-known that in finite strategic games true common belief (or common knowledge) of rational...
In the context of strategic games, we provide an axiomatic proof of the statement "Common knowledge ...
We provide here an epistemic analysis of arbitrary strategic games based on the possibility correspo...
textabstractWe provide here an epistemic analysis of arbitrary strategic games based on the possibil...
Abstract. The epistemic conditions of “rationality and common belief of ra-tionality ” and “rational...
We consider strategic-form games with ordinal payoffs and provide a syntactic analysis of common bel...
The concept of strict dominance provides a technique that can be used normatively to predict the pla...
International audienceWe propose some variants of a multi-modal of joint action, preference and know...
We propose some variants of a multi-modal of joint action, preference and knowledge that support rea...
In his dissertation of 1950, Nash based his concept of the solution to a game on the assumption that...
In this paper we focus on dynamic games with almost perfect information, that is, at every stage som...
We study games in the presence of an interaction structure, which allows players to communicate thei...
Two natural strategy elimination procedures have been studied for strategic games. The first one inv...
Rational decisions depend on what players know, hence an appropriate epistemic analysis is an integr...
AbstractIf a finite strategic game is strictly dominance solvable, then every simultaneous best resp...