Seven classifiers are compared on sixteen quite different, standard and extensively used datasets in terms of classification error rates and computational times. It is found that the average error rates for a majority of the classifiers are closes with each other but the computational times of the classifiers differ over a wide range. The statistical classifier Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO) based on Support Vector Machine has the lowest average error rate and computationally it is faster than four classifiers but slightly expensive than other two classifiers
In practical applications, machine learning algorithms are often needed to learn classifiers that op...
<p>The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each of three classifiers (Linear SVM, RBF SVM, NN) ...
<p>Comparison of the performance of Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier with sampling using poly...
Purpose. Data mining is the forthcoming research area to solve different problems and classification...
This article points out an important source of inefficiency in Platt's sequential minimal optimizati...
This thesis is a critical empirical study, using a range of benchmark datasets, on the performance o...
The support vector machine (SVM) classifier has been a popular classification tool used for a variet...
This paper points out an important source of inefficiency in Smola and Scholkopfs sequential minimal...
Performance of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Multilayer perception, and XGBoost classifiers...
This thesis evaluates the training performance of classifiers in terms of Root Mean Square Error (RM...
<p>(a) semantic verbal fluency, (b) phonological verbal fluency and (c) combined datasets. Classific...
Performance of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Multilayer perception, and XGBoost classifiers...
Appropriate training data always play an important role in constructing an efficient classifier to s...
In today’s world,enormous amount of data is available in every field including science, industry, bu...
Abstract: The development of data-mining applications such as classification has shown the need for ...
In practical applications, machine learning algorithms are often needed to learn classifiers that op...
<p>The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each of three classifiers (Linear SVM, RBF SVM, NN) ...
<p>Comparison of the performance of Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier with sampling using poly...
Purpose. Data mining is the forthcoming research area to solve different problems and classification...
This article points out an important source of inefficiency in Platt's sequential minimal optimizati...
This thesis is a critical empirical study, using a range of benchmark datasets, on the performance o...
The support vector machine (SVM) classifier has been a popular classification tool used for a variet...
This paper points out an important source of inefficiency in Smola and Scholkopfs sequential minimal...
Performance of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Multilayer perception, and XGBoost classifiers...
This thesis evaluates the training performance of classifiers in terms of Root Mean Square Error (RM...
<p>(a) semantic verbal fluency, (b) phonological verbal fluency and (c) combined datasets. Classific...
Performance of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Multilayer perception, and XGBoost classifiers...
Appropriate training data always play an important role in constructing an efficient classifier to s...
In today’s world,enormous amount of data is available in every field including science, industry, bu...
Abstract: The development of data-mining applications such as classification has shown the need for ...
In practical applications, machine learning algorithms are often needed to learn classifiers that op...
<p>The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each of three classifiers (Linear SVM, RBF SVM, NN) ...
<p>Comparison of the performance of Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier with sampling using poly...