Add to ORKGThe paper sets out to compare writing practices from two academic disciplines - history and economics - in order to find out the most frequent lexical and phraseological tools employed by the respective discourse communities in order to claim significance. Corpus data show that historians and economists make a different use of linguistic resources at their disposal in order to stress the centrality of their research with regard to the wider disciplinary debate
The study is based on the analysis of three small corpora, which weredesigned to compare economics t...
This chapter has two research aims. The first is to examine how speakers mark importance both at loc...
The paper is intended to investigate cross-disciplinary variation in academic discourse. On the basi...
The paper sets out to compare writing practices from two academic disciplines - history and economic...
The aim of this paper is to study how evaluation of importance can contribute to guiding the recogni...
The article focuses on disciplinary differences in the use of textual voices by comparing article op...
The role played by mitigation in academic discourse has been widely debated in the literature, but l...
This paper illustrates the methods employed in a recent study of academic writing based on a 1 milli...
This volume reflects the emerging interest in cross-disciplinary variation in both spoken and writte...
The paper focuses on the corpus-based analysis of academic discourse values. The research aim is to ...
While acknowledging the importance of specific lexis in profiling discourse communities, studies on ...
Evaluations of importance are central to the nature of academic discourse, with its need to establis...
The study focuses on two small corpora of book review articles in history and looks at the lexicaliz...
Using the British Academic Spoken English corpus, this study investigates what linguistic devices le...
An overview of recently published research on cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary aspects of aca...
The study is based on the analysis of three small corpora, which weredesigned to compare economics t...
This chapter has two research aims. The first is to examine how speakers mark importance both at loc...
The paper is intended to investigate cross-disciplinary variation in academic discourse. On the basi...
The paper sets out to compare writing practices from two academic disciplines - history and economic...
The aim of this paper is to study how evaluation of importance can contribute to guiding the recogni...
The article focuses on disciplinary differences in the use of textual voices by comparing article op...
The role played by mitigation in academic discourse has been widely debated in the literature, but l...
This paper illustrates the methods employed in a recent study of academic writing based on a 1 milli...
This volume reflects the emerging interest in cross-disciplinary variation in both spoken and writte...
The paper focuses on the corpus-based analysis of academic discourse values. The research aim is to ...
While acknowledging the importance of specific lexis in profiling discourse communities, studies on ...
Evaluations of importance are central to the nature of academic discourse, with its need to establis...
The study focuses on two small corpora of book review articles in history and looks at the lexicaliz...
Using the British Academic Spoken English corpus, this study investigates what linguistic devices le...
An overview of recently published research on cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary aspects of aca...
The study is based on the analysis of three small corpora, which weredesigned to compare economics t...
This chapter has two research aims. The first is to examine how speakers mark importance both at loc...
The paper is intended to investigate cross-disciplinary variation in academic discourse. On the basi...