Comparison of post-procedural rise of cardiac biomarkers after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with long/diffuse LAD disease

Objectives This study sought to evaluate the incidence and the mechanism of post-procedural cardiac biomarker (CB) rise following device implantation. Background A fully bioresorbable Absorb scaffold, compared with everolimus-eluting metallic stents (EES), might be associated with a higher incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury. Methods  Prospective nonrandomized comparative study enrolled 52 patients with stable myocardial ischemia with diffuse/ long LAD lesion for either an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular (BVS) scaffold (22 patients) or an EES (30 patients), 3 types of CB (creatine kinase (CK), creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB), and troponin) were obtained before and after procedure. Per protocol, periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) was defined as CK rise >2  the upper limit of normal with CK-MB rise. Results Incidence of side branch occlusion (SBO) and any anatomic complications assessed by angiography was similar between the 2 treatment arms (SBO: Absorb: 4.5% vs. Xience: 6.7%, p=1; One PMI with acute instent thrombosis occurred in EES group. Dissection occurred in only 1 patient in BVS arm after stent implantation; this event was not associated with elevated cardiac biomarkers. One patient had PMI in BVS arm with no angiographic complications to explain it.&nbsp