Objective: It is still debatable whether diagnostic coronary angiography (CA) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) increase radiation exposure when performed via radial approach as compared to femoral approach. This question was investigated in this study by comparison of dose-area product (DAP), reference air kerma (RAK), and fluoroscopy time (FT) among radial and femoral approaches
BACKGROUND: Exposure to radiation during fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures is a cause for c...
ObjectivesThe authors sought to compare the radiation dose between radial and femoral access.Backgro...
Background and Aim. The aim of study was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and procedural variables o...
Conclusion: In spite of an increased experience with trans-radial approach, PCI of coronary lesions ...
ABSTRACTBackgroundAlthough the transradial approach had significantly reduced vascular complications...
ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare radiation exposure of patients undergoing percutaneous coronar...
Background Literature suggests that radial access is associated with higher radiation doses than fem...
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether radial access increases the risk of operator or patient r...
Transradial coronary angiography has a lower incidence of access site complications, earlier patient...
It remains unclear whether radial increases the risk of operator or patient radiation exposure when ...
One of the major criticisms of the radial approach is that it takes longer overall procedure and flu...
BackgroundBecause of a presumably increased incidence of long-term malignancy in interventional card...
radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc...
The adoption of the transradial (TR) approach over the traditional transfemoral (TF) approach has be...
We sought to compare operator radiation exposure during procedures using right femoral access (RFA),...
BACKGROUND: Exposure to radiation during fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures is a cause for c...
ObjectivesThe authors sought to compare the radiation dose between radial and femoral access.Backgro...
Background and Aim. The aim of study was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and procedural variables o...
Conclusion: In spite of an increased experience with trans-radial approach, PCI of coronary lesions ...
ABSTRACTBackgroundAlthough the transradial approach had significantly reduced vascular complications...
ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare radiation exposure of patients undergoing percutaneous coronar...
Background Literature suggests that radial access is associated with higher radiation doses than fem...
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether radial access increases the risk of operator or patient r...
Transradial coronary angiography has a lower incidence of access site complications, earlier patient...
It remains unclear whether radial increases the risk of operator or patient radiation exposure when ...
One of the major criticisms of the radial approach is that it takes longer overall procedure and flu...
BackgroundBecause of a presumably increased incidence of long-term malignancy in interventional card...
radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc...
The adoption of the transradial (TR) approach over the traditional transfemoral (TF) approach has be...
We sought to compare operator radiation exposure during procedures using right femoral access (RFA),...
BACKGROUND: Exposure to radiation during fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures is a cause for c...
ObjectivesThe authors sought to compare the radiation dose between radial and femoral access.Backgro...
Background and Aim. The aim of study was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and procedural variables o...