The principles of ERRANS are introduced by considering two radically different contexts: Within academic publishing, the literary form of the edited collection is as common as it is denigrated and rarely reflected upon. The account being offered (within an edited collection) seeks to not only reinterpret the status of the genre, but argues in favor of a curatorial errancy within scholarly communication. Yet errancy has also become a crucial touchstone in management and leadership studies, whether as ‘disruptive innovation’ or ‘VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity) worlds’, inviting a different consideration of the relationship between capitalism and its political and artistic critiques than the one offered by Luc Boltanski a...
One of the first principles of capitalism is, undeniably, instrumentalisation; the subjection of one...
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence...
This report is a consideration of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation\u27s 2014–2015 scholarly communica...
The principles of ERRANS are introduced by considering two radically different contexts: Within acad...
Today’s critical discourses and theorizing vanguards agree on the importance of getting lost, of fai...
oai:ici-berlin.org:ci-15_01Arnd Wedemeyer and Christoph F. E. Holzhey, ‘Preface’, in Re-: An Errant ...
Faculty can define “academic integrity” not as an absence or prevalence of cheating, but as “academi...
The rhetoric of “excellence” is pervasive across the academy. It is used to refer to research output...
The rhetoric of “excellence” is pervasive across the academy. It is used to refer to research output...
This paper presents a research-based, theoretically-informed contribution to the debate on ‘impact’ ...
As I mull the current issue – a wonderful collection of open submissions and a terrific supplement o...
As a (former) vandal-punk in the academy, I often fear succumbing to Ivory Tower Stockholm syndrome....
This article ponders two questions: What does “postqualitative” mean to you? Why do you think the “p...
Through exchanges within a doctoral supervision, the authors explore a range of dilemmas and challen...
We encounter a lot of information on art and curatorial projects through a wide variety of publicati...
One of the first principles of capitalism is, undeniably, instrumentalisation; the subjection of one...
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence...
This report is a consideration of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation\u27s 2014–2015 scholarly communica...
The principles of ERRANS are introduced by considering two radically different contexts: Within acad...
Today’s critical discourses and theorizing vanguards agree on the importance of getting lost, of fai...
oai:ici-berlin.org:ci-15_01Arnd Wedemeyer and Christoph F. E. Holzhey, ‘Preface’, in Re-: An Errant ...
Faculty can define “academic integrity” not as an absence or prevalence of cheating, but as “academi...
The rhetoric of “excellence” is pervasive across the academy. It is used to refer to research output...
The rhetoric of “excellence” is pervasive across the academy. It is used to refer to research output...
This paper presents a research-based, theoretically-informed contribution to the debate on ‘impact’ ...
As I mull the current issue – a wonderful collection of open submissions and a terrific supplement o...
As a (former) vandal-punk in the academy, I often fear succumbing to Ivory Tower Stockholm syndrome....
This article ponders two questions: What does “postqualitative” mean to you? Why do you think the “p...
Through exchanges within a doctoral supervision, the authors explore a range of dilemmas and challen...
We encounter a lot of information on art and curatorial projects through a wide variety of publicati...
One of the first principles of capitalism is, undeniably, instrumentalisation; the subjection of one...
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence...
This report is a consideration of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation\u27s 2014–2015 scholarly communica...