In Section “Eigenchannel R-matrix approach and formula for rate coefficient” of the article, there are typos in equation (8), the equation after, and equation (10). The correct equations are: (Formula Presented.) and (Formula Presented.) The numerical results presented in the paper were obtained with correct equations. No other changes needed in the presented results
In the original version of this article unfortunately the copyright holder in the PDF was wrong. The...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
Equation (3.29) should be (equation presented) where the extra term comes from equation (B.4) with v...
We have corrected Eqs. (17)–(20) from Section 8 of the original paper. The published versions of Eqs...
We have corrected Eqs. (17)–(20) from Section 8 of the original paper. The published versions of Eqs...
In the original version of this article unfortunately the copyright holder in the PDF was wrong. The...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrec...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have corrected Eqs. (17)–(20) from Section 8 of the original paper. The published versions of Eqs...
The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrec...
In the original version of this article unfortunately the copyright holder in the PDF was wrong. The...
There is an error on page 5 of the original paper,1 in the last equation before Eq. (16), where the ...
\u3cp\u3eThere is an error on page 5 of the original paper,\u3csup\u3e1\u3c/sup\u3e in the last equa...
Due to an oversight of ours in proofreading and a communication problem with the publisher, the figu...
In the original version of this article unfortunately the copyright holder in the PDF was wrong. The...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
Equation (3.29) should be (equation presented) where the extra term comes from equation (B.4) with v...
We have corrected Eqs. (17)–(20) from Section 8 of the original paper. The published versions of Eqs...
We have corrected Eqs. (17)–(20) from Section 8 of the original paper. The published versions of Eqs...
In the original version of this article unfortunately the copyright holder in the PDF was wrong. The...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrec...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have corrected Eqs. (17)–(20) from Section 8 of the original paper. The published versions of Eqs...
The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrec...
In the original version of this article unfortunately the copyright holder in the PDF was wrong. The...
There is an error on page 5 of the original paper,1 in the last equation before Eq. (16), where the ...
\u3cp\u3eThere is an error on page 5 of the original paper,\u3csup\u3e1\u3c/sup\u3e in the last equa...
Due to an oversight of ours in proofreading and a communication problem with the publisher, the figu...
In the original version of this article unfortunately the copyright holder in the PDF was wrong. The...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
Equation (3.29) should be (equation presented) where the extra term comes from equation (B.4) with v...