In the version of this Perspective initially published, there was an error in units reported in the main text. Specifically, in the first sentence of the sixth paragraph under the heading “A critical review of EBVs retrieved by remote sensing,” in the text now reading “Finally, when harmonizing the terminology used by ecological and remote sensing communities, it is important to emphasize that utilizing broadband optical wavelengths (for example, for PlanetScope, approximately 400–700 nm) at very high spatial resolution,” 400–700 nm originally appeared as “60–90 nm.” The error has been corrected in the online version of the article
International audienceIn the original version of this Article, the data accession 10.17882/42182 was...
In this article, the abstract has been revised such that “30% of the total CO2 increase in the atmos...
Equation (5) is incorrect in our paper published in Remote Sensing in 2009 [1]. The correct equatio
In the version of this Perspective initially published, there was an error in units reported in the ...
In the version of this Perspective originally published, the names of authors Pedro J. Leitão and Il...
The original version of this book was inadvertently published with an incorrect affiliation
In the version of this article initially published, the plots on the left-hand side of Extended Data...
Due to an oversight by the authors there is a correction necessary in this publication [1]. We would...
Correction to: Nature Ecology & Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0889-z, published onlin...
Space-based tracking technology using low-cost miniature tags is now delivering data on fine-scale a...
There are two mistakes in this article [1]. On page 523, lines 10–11, the sentence “the value of the...
Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21176-6, published online 10...
In the original published version of the article, the acknowledgements incorrectly omitted a stateme...
Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43716-3, published online 16 Ma...
The original version of this article contained errors in Refs 15, 27, 32, 33 and 43, which were inco...
International audienceIn the original version of this Article, the data accession 10.17882/42182 was...
In this article, the abstract has been revised such that “30% of the total CO2 increase in the atmos...
Equation (5) is incorrect in our paper published in Remote Sensing in 2009 [1]. The correct equatio
In the version of this Perspective initially published, there was an error in units reported in the ...
In the version of this Perspective originally published, the names of authors Pedro J. Leitão and Il...
The original version of this book was inadvertently published with an incorrect affiliation
In the version of this article initially published, the plots on the left-hand side of Extended Data...
Due to an oversight by the authors there is a correction necessary in this publication [1]. We would...
Correction to: Nature Ecology & Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0889-z, published onlin...
Space-based tracking technology using low-cost miniature tags is now delivering data on fine-scale a...
There are two mistakes in this article [1]. On page 523, lines 10–11, the sentence “the value of the...
Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21176-6, published online 10...
In the original published version of the article, the acknowledgements incorrectly omitted a stateme...
Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43716-3, published online 16 Ma...
The original version of this article contained errors in Refs 15, 27, 32, 33 and 43, which were inco...
International audienceIn the original version of this Article, the data accession 10.17882/42182 was...
In this article, the abstract has been revised such that “30% of the total CO2 increase in the atmos...
Equation (5) is incorrect in our paper published in Remote Sensing in 2009 [1]. The correct equatio