In the originally published version of thismanuscript, there were several errors which are listed in this corrigendumas follows: In Table 4, The Level of Evidence for "For venous access, the cephalic or axillary vein should be considered as first choice" should read "B" instead of "C". In Table 10, the wording "TAVI in valve in valve vs. native valve procedure" should read "TAVI in native valve vs. valve-in-valve procedure". In the Supplementary Data, the wording in Table 14 should read "TAVI in native valve vs. valve-in-valve procedure" instead of "TAVI in valve in valve vs. native valve procedure". These errors have now been corrected
Erratum for article: Emced K. Comparing the outcomes of routine and selective epicardial pacing wire...
The original version of this article, published on 05 September 2019, unfortunately contained a mist...
The original version of this article, published on 05 September 2019, unfortunately contained a mist...
In the originally published version of thismanuscript, there were several errors which are listed in...
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. The original publication contained an incorrect F...
Corrigendum to: 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation develope...
Supplementary Table 9, column 'Edoxaban', row 'eGFR category', '95 mL/min' (page 15). The cell shoul...
In the original publication of the article, in Sect. 2.2, the sentence that reads as “TPTD is a well...
In the original publication of the article, in Sect. 2.2, the sentence that reads as “TPTD is a well...
In the published article Table 1, the last line/row (Total), there was an overlap of text detail bet...
International audienceErratum for Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in ...
The authors regret that the following contributors were not acknowledged in the original manuscript:...
none24siModification of recommendationsnoneKonstantinides, S.V.; Torbicki, A; Agnelli, G; Danchin, N...
none24siModification of recommendationsnoneKonstantinides, S.V.; Torbicki, A; Agnelli, G; Danchin, N...
Correction to: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson (2017) 19: 75. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8 In the original...
Erratum for article: Emced K. Comparing the outcomes of routine and selective epicardial pacing wire...
The original version of this article, published on 05 September 2019, unfortunately contained a mist...
The original version of this article, published on 05 September 2019, unfortunately contained a mist...
In the originally published version of thismanuscript, there were several errors which are listed in...
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. The original publication contained an incorrect F...
Corrigendum to: 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation develope...
Supplementary Table 9, column 'Edoxaban', row 'eGFR category', '95 mL/min' (page 15). The cell shoul...
In the original publication of the article, in Sect. 2.2, the sentence that reads as “TPTD is a well...
In the original publication of the article, in Sect. 2.2, the sentence that reads as “TPTD is a well...
In the published article Table 1, the last line/row (Total), there was an overlap of text detail bet...
International audienceErratum for Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in ...
The authors regret that the following contributors were not acknowledged in the original manuscript:...
none24siModification of recommendationsnoneKonstantinides, S.V.; Torbicki, A; Agnelli, G; Danchin, N...
none24siModification of recommendationsnoneKonstantinides, S.V.; Torbicki, A; Agnelli, G; Danchin, N...
Correction to: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson (2017) 19: 75. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8 In the original...
Erratum for article: Emced K. Comparing the outcomes of routine and selective epicardial pacing wire...
The original version of this article, published on 05 September 2019, unfortunately contained a mist...
The original version of this article, published on 05 September 2019, unfortunately contained a mist...