Using Referential Language Games for Task-oriented Ontology Alignment

Ontology Alignment (OA) is generally performed by requesting two parties to provide their complete knowledge to a third party that suggests potential schema alignments. This might however not always be possible or helpful, as for example, when two organisations want to query each other’s knowledge, and none of them is willing to share their schema due to information privacy considerations. This Ph.D. explores how to allow multi-agent communication in cases where agents operate using different ontologies that cannot be fully exposed or shared. Our preliminary experiments focus on the case where agents’ knowledge is describing a common set of entities and has the form of Knowledge Graphs (KGs). The suggested methodology is based on the grounded naming game, where agents are forced to develop their own language in order to refer to corresponding schema concepts of different ontologies. This way, agents that use different ontologies can still communicate successfully for a task at hand, without revealing any private information. We have performed some proof of concept experiments applying our suggested method on artificial cases and we are on the process of extending our methodology so that it can be applied in real-world KGs