'Blinding' involves concealing knowledge of which trial participants received the interventions from participants themselves and other trial personnel throughout the trial. Blinding reduces bias arising from the beliefs and expectations of these groups. It is agreed that where possible, blinding should be attempted, for example by ensuring that experimental and control treatments look the same. However, there is a debate about if we should measure whether blinding has been successful, this manuscript will discuss this controversy, including the benefits and risks of measuring blinding within the randomised controlled trial. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
BACKGROUND: Blinding is a cornerstone of therapeutic evaluation because lack of blinding can bias tr...
The feature of being ‘double blind’, where neither patients nor physicians are aware of who receives...
In their paper discussing the assessment of blinding in clinical trials, Bang et al. based their ana...
'Blinding' involves concealing knowledge of which trial participants received the interventions from...
'Blinding' involves concealing knowledge of which trial participants received the interventions from...
The search for new treatments and testing of new ideas begins in the laboratory and then established...
The interaction between the patient's expected outcome of an intervention and the inherent effects o...
Blinding mitigates several sources of bias which, if left unchecked, can quantitively affect study o...
In this paper, we use evidence from our earlier review of surgical randomised controlled trials with...
A key feature to many randomized, controlled trials is that they implement a blind; that is, subject...
The rich history of blinding in clinical trials spans a couple of centuries.1 Most researchers world...
In this paper, we have used evidence from our earlier review of surgical randomised controlled trial...
The CONSORT statement recommended that investigators should clearly report which key trial persons w...
BACKGROUND: Blinding is a cornerstone of treatment evaluation. Blinding is more difficult to obtain ...
BACKGROUND: Blinding is a cornerstone of therapeutic evaluation because lack of blinding can bias tr...
The feature of being ‘double blind’, where neither patients nor physicians are aware of who receives...
In their paper discussing the assessment of blinding in clinical trials, Bang et al. based their ana...
'Blinding' involves concealing knowledge of which trial participants received the interventions from...
'Blinding' involves concealing knowledge of which trial participants received the interventions from...
The search for new treatments and testing of new ideas begins in the laboratory and then established...
The interaction between the patient's expected outcome of an intervention and the inherent effects o...
Blinding mitigates several sources of bias which, if left unchecked, can quantitively affect study o...
In this paper, we use evidence from our earlier review of surgical randomised controlled trials with...
A key feature to many randomized, controlled trials is that they implement a blind; that is, subject...
The rich history of blinding in clinical trials spans a couple of centuries.1 Most researchers world...
In this paper, we have used evidence from our earlier review of surgical randomised controlled trial...
The CONSORT statement recommended that investigators should clearly report which key trial persons w...
BACKGROUND: Blinding is a cornerstone of treatment evaluation. Blinding is more difficult to obtain ...
BACKGROUND: Blinding is a cornerstone of therapeutic evaluation because lack of blinding can bias tr...
The feature of being ‘double blind’, where neither patients nor physicians are aware of who receives...
In their paper discussing the assessment of blinding in clinical trials, Bang et al. based their ana...