This book investigates the dynamic intertwinement of law and morality, with a focus on new and developing fields of law. Taking as its starting point the debates and mutual misunderstandings between proponents of different philosophical traditions, it argues that this theoretical pluralism is better explained once law is accepted as an essentially ambiguous concept. Continuing on, the book develops a robust theory of law that increases our grasp on global legal pluralism and the dynamics of law. This theory of legal interactionism, inspired by the work of Lon Fuller and Philip Selznick, also helps us to understand apparent anomalies of modern law, such as international law, the law of the European Convention on Human Rights and horizontal i...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
The more we examine what is behind our most difficult legal questions, the more puzzling it can seem...
The more we examine what is behind our most difficult legal questions, the more puzzling it can seem...
One of the perennial discussions in legal philosophy is: What is law? Theories that elucidate the co...
Legal instrumentalism has a bad name: it is criticized for reducing law to a policy instrument for e...
markdownabstractIntroduction The claim of this book is that many issues may be put into a new li...
This paper introduces this Special Number. The work of the Project Group Legal Pluralism at the Max ...
Much legal-pluralist scholarship tends to naturalize the law of the context, treating that law as ...
Taking our cue from Roger Cotterrell, we believe that legal philosophy, legal sociology and doctrina...
The increasingly cosmopolitan nature of the nation-state, plus an increasing scepticism toward the m...
Sionaidh Douglas-Scott's book, Law after Modernity, outlines a sophisticated theory of legal plurali...
Collective Action, Philosophy and Law brings together two important strands of philosophical analysi...
Collective Action, Philosophy and Law brings together two important strands of philosophical analysi...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
The more we examine what is behind our most difficult legal questions, the more puzzling it can seem...
The more we examine what is behind our most difficult legal questions, the more puzzling it can seem...
One of the perennial discussions in legal philosophy is: What is law? Theories that elucidate the co...
Legal instrumentalism has a bad name: it is criticized for reducing law to a policy instrument for e...
markdownabstractIntroduction The claim of this book is that many issues may be put into a new li...
This paper introduces this Special Number. The work of the Project Group Legal Pluralism at the Max ...
Much legal-pluralist scholarship tends to naturalize the law of the context, treating that law as ...
Taking our cue from Roger Cotterrell, we believe that legal philosophy, legal sociology and doctrina...
The increasingly cosmopolitan nature of the nation-state, plus an increasing scepticism toward the m...
Sionaidh Douglas-Scott's book, Law after Modernity, outlines a sophisticated theory of legal plurali...
Collective Action, Philosophy and Law brings together two important strands of philosophical analysi...
Collective Action, Philosophy and Law brings together two important strands of philosophical analysi...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
The more we examine what is behind our most difficult legal questions, the more puzzling it can seem...
The more we examine what is behind our most difficult legal questions, the more puzzling it can seem...