Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Di Wilayah Hukum Polres Indragiri Hilir Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XII/2014

Massive cases of forest and land fires that often occur in Indragiri Hilir Regency leave problems, especially related to law enforcement in the process of investigation and investigation between Polri investigators, civil servants investigators and Attorney General investigators, especially in cases of environmental crimes, which should be carried out by a team of investigators. integrated between the three institutions, this refers to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XII/2014 dated January 21, 2015, Article 95 Paragraph (1) of the PPLH Law was changed to read: "In the context of law enforcement against perpetrators of environmental crimes , including other crimes originating from violations of this law, integrated law enforcement is carried out between civil servant investigators, the police, and the prosecutor's office under the coordination of the Minister." However, the facts on the ground regarding environmental crime cases in the jurisdiction of the Inhil Resort Police, the investigation process was not carried out by an integrated team, so this has become an interesting subject to study in the form of a thesis. Based on this phenomenon, this study establishes 2 main points The Environment in the Legal Territory of the Indragiri Hilir Police Station after the Decision The problems are first, How is the Law Enforcement of Criminal Laws of the Constitutional Court Number 18/Puu-Xii/2014? Second, what are the obstacles to law enforcement on environmental crimes in the region Indragiri Hilir Police Law After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/Puu-Xii/2014? This type of research is included in the group of observational research or Non Doctrinal Research, namely by looking at how the Law Enforcement of Environmental Crimes in the Legal Territory of the Indragiri Hilir Resort Police After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/Puu-Xii/2014. While seen from its nature is descriptive analytical. The results of the study can be seen: First, law enforcement of the investigation of environmental crimes in the jurisdiction of the Inhil Resort Police after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XII/2014 did not run as determined or did not have a very large influence on environmental law enforcement which required the existence of integrated law enforcement or a one-stop investigation between the police, PPNS and the public prosecutor, because the investigation is only carried out by the investigator alone. Second, the Barriers to the Implementation of the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 18/PUU-XII/2014 on Environmental Crime Investigations by Police Investigators in the Case of Land and Forest Fires at the Inhil Police Station is because the PPNS, Polri, and Public Prosecutor's Offices do not have togetherness and do not carry out proper coordination. good, as well as the absence of legal instruments in forming an integrated one-roof law enforcement agency and the absence of an understanding to cooperate with each other among the police officers, the Attorney General's Office