This critique of Malinvaud’s article of 2003 on Wicksell’s legacy to capital theory focuses in particular on three points raised there. The first regards the given amount of existing capital that appears in Wicksell’s theory and its connection with his alleged “missing equation”, the second the particular notion of the marginal product of capital adopted by Malinvaud and the meaning of its equality with the rate of interest, and the third the concept of the average period of production taken by Malinvaud from Hicks and its inverse relation to the rate of interest
The Böhm-Bawerk- Clark debate is overlooked and misinterpreted in capital theory, despite its influ...
The paper addresses the ambiguity that surrounds the conception of capital and its role in neoclassi...
The purpose of this note is to supplement the author’s earlier remarks on the unsatisfactory nature ...
This critique of Malinvaud’s article of 2003 on Wicksell’s legacy to capital theory focuses in parti...
This critique of Malinvaud’s article of 2003 on Wicksell’s legacy to capital theory focuses in parti...
Malinvaud took up the concept of the average period of production introduced by Hicks in Value and C...
The difficulties in traditional capital theory, which have recently given rise to the reswitching of...
In this paper we examine the criticism that Knut Wicksell advanced against Walras’s treatment of cap...
This article is a follow-up to the Capital Theory Controversy that took place in 1960s-70s. In broad...
We examine the criticism that Knut Wicksell advanced against Léon Walras’s treatment of capital and ...
The idea that capital theory might lead economists to discover forms of ‘paradoxical’ behaviour has ...
This book deals with the Cambridge capital theory controversies both from a historical and from an a...
The idea that capital theory might lead economists to discover forms of ‘paradoxical’ behaviour has...
Malinvaud (2003) observed that once techniques are ranked according to Hick’s concept of average per...
Although it might have been expected that, by this point in time, the unacceptability of the margina...
The Böhm-Bawerk- Clark debate is overlooked and misinterpreted in capital theory, despite its influ...
The paper addresses the ambiguity that surrounds the conception of capital and its role in neoclassi...
The purpose of this note is to supplement the author’s earlier remarks on the unsatisfactory nature ...
This critique of Malinvaud’s article of 2003 on Wicksell’s legacy to capital theory focuses in parti...
This critique of Malinvaud’s article of 2003 on Wicksell’s legacy to capital theory focuses in parti...
Malinvaud took up the concept of the average period of production introduced by Hicks in Value and C...
The difficulties in traditional capital theory, which have recently given rise to the reswitching of...
In this paper we examine the criticism that Knut Wicksell advanced against Walras’s treatment of cap...
This article is a follow-up to the Capital Theory Controversy that took place in 1960s-70s. In broad...
We examine the criticism that Knut Wicksell advanced against Léon Walras’s treatment of capital and ...
The idea that capital theory might lead economists to discover forms of ‘paradoxical’ behaviour has ...
This book deals with the Cambridge capital theory controversies both from a historical and from an a...
The idea that capital theory might lead economists to discover forms of ‘paradoxical’ behaviour has...
Malinvaud (2003) observed that once techniques are ranked according to Hick’s concept of average per...
Although it might have been expected that, by this point in time, the unacceptability of the margina...
The Böhm-Bawerk- Clark debate is overlooked and misinterpreted in capital theory, despite its influ...
The paper addresses the ambiguity that surrounds the conception of capital and its role in neoclassi...
The purpose of this note is to supplement the author’s earlier remarks on the unsatisfactory nature ...