Two recent judgments respectively of the European Court of Justice and of the European Court of Human Rights contribute to the clarification of the consequences stemming from the adoption of a national judgment violating EU law. In both cases the role of the request for a preliminary ruling is analysed, both in relation to mutual trust as a general principle of EU law and to the right of equitable process as a fundamental human right. There could be a risk of infringement of the right of equitable process in the absence of a referral to the European Court of Justice when it is so required. It could amount also to a violation of (European) public policy limiting the free circulation of judicial decisions in other Member States
In its judgment of 30 June 2005 in the case of Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim ¸ Sir...
European Court Judicial decisions are binding for all national courts, including the highest courts ...
Judgment no. 269/2017 of the Constitutional Court overruled previous rulings by recognizing priorit...
Two recent judgments respectively of the European Court of Justice and of the European Court of Hum...
Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on juris...
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on ju...
Through the years the European Court of Justice has by means of judicial activism transformed the EU...
The Court of Justice of the European Union(the CJEU)delivered Court Opinion 2/13 according to which ...
In a considerable number of areas, the European Union has developed its own state-like foreign polic...
Analysing the concept of the free movement of judgments from the linguistic point, the wrong presump...
European Court of Human Rights states that the execution of final decisions is a compulsory provisio...
This paper presents the remedies available to persons whose European law rights have been infringed ...
The theme of “judicial liability in Europe” revolves around the possibility to impose liability on ...
The Court of Justice of the European Union faces a wide variety of human rights decisions. In common...
The article deals with Judgment No. 2800 of 1 December 2006 of Court of Cassation (the highest court...
In its judgment of 30 June 2005 in the case of Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim ¸ Sir...
European Court Judicial decisions are binding for all national courts, including the highest courts ...
Judgment no. 269/2017 of the Constitutional Court overruled previous rulings by recognizing priorit...
Two recent judgments respectively of the European Court of Justice and of the European Court of Hum...
Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on juris...
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on ju...
Through the years the European Court of Justice has by means of judicial activism transformed the EU...
The Court of Justice of the European Union(the CJEU)delivered Court Opinion 2/13 according to which ...
In a considerable number of areas, the European Union has developed its own state-like foreign polic...
Analysing the concept of the free movement of judgments from the linguistic point, the wrong presump...
European Court of Human Rights states that the execution of final decisions is a compulsory provisio...
This paper presents the remedies available to persons whose European law rights have been infringed ...
The theme of “judicial liability in Europe” revolves around the possibility to impose liability on ...
The Court of Justice of the European Union faces a wide variety of human rights decisions. In common...
The article deals with Judgment No. 2800 of 1 December 2006 of Court of Cassation (the highest court...
In its judgment of 30 June 2005 in the case of Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim ¸ Sir...
European Court Judicial decisions are binding for all national courts, including the highest courts ...
Judgment no. 269/2017 of the Constitutional Court overruled previous rulings by recognizing priorit...