CEPR WP - DP11426: Disputes over penalties for breaching a contract are often resolved in court. A simple model illustrates how inefficient courts can sway public buyers from enforcing a penalty for late delivery in order to avoid litigation, therefore inducing sellers to delay contract delivery. By using a large dataset on Italian public procurement, we empirically study the effects of court inefficiency on public work performance. We find that where courts are inefficient: i) public works are delivered with longer delays; ii) delays increase for more valuable contracts; iii) contracts are more often awarded to larger suppliers; and iv) a higher share of the payment is postponed after delivery. Other interpretations receive less support fr...
Cost inefficiencies in public procurement tend to come from two sources: corruption (moral hazard) a...
Ascertaining the cause/s of differences in performance between units of the public administration is...
We provide a general framework in which to determine the optimal penalty fee inducing the contractor...
CEPR Discussion Paper 11426 http://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=11426D...
Disputes over penalties for breaching a contract are often resolved in court. A simple model illustr...
The inefficiency of the judicial system might affect the extent of delays in the execution of public...
We consider the supplier’s strategic choice on delivery time in a public procurement setting as the ...
Evidence from ongoing procurement and concession contracts shows that time overruns are widespread. ...
We consider the supplier’s strategic choice on delivery time in a public procurement setting as the ...
We provide a general framework in which to determine the optimal penalty fee inducing the contractor...
The deterioration of public finance and increase in global competition have forced governments and p...
We provide a general framework in which to determine the optimal penalty fee inducing the contractor...
Cost inefficiencies in public procurement tend to come from two sources: corruption (moral hazard) a...
Ascertaining the cause/s of differences in performance between units of the public administration is...
We provide a general framework in which to determine the optimal penalty fee inducing the contractor...
CEPR Discussion Paper 11426 http://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=11426D...
Disputes over penalties for breaching a contract are often resolved in court. A simple model illustr...
The inefficiency of the judicial system might affect the extent of delays in the execution of public...
We consider the supplier’s strategic choice on delivery time in a public procurement setting as the ...
Evidence from ongoing procurement and concession contracts shows that time overruns are widespread. ...
We consider the supplier’s strategic choice on delivery time in a public procurement setting as the ...
We provide a general framework in which to determine the optimal penalty fee inducing the contractor...
The deterioration of public finance and increase in global competition have forced governments and p...
We provide a general framework in which to determine the optimal penalty fee inducing the contractor...
Cost inefficiencies in public procurement tend to come from two sources: corruption (moral hazard) a...
Ascertaining the cause/s of differences in performance between units of the public administration is...
We provide a general framework in which to determine the optimal penalty fee inducing the contractor...