The Medical Cartesianism of Henricus Regius : Disciplinary Partitions, Mechanical Reductionism and Methodological Aspects

This article explores the medical theories of the Dutch philosopher and physician Henricus Regius (1598-1679), who sought to provide clear- er notions of medicine than the traditional theories of Jean Fernel, Dan- iel Sennert and Vopiscus Plempius. To achieve this, Regius overtly built upon the natural philosophy of René Descartes, in particular his theories of mechanical physiology and the corpuscular nature of matter. First, I show that Regius envisaged a novel partitioning of medicine, intended to make it independent in exposition but conceptually ground- ed in natural philosophy. This served his overall purpose of making med- icine a ‘clearer’ discipline. To this end Regius detaches the general notion of physiology as the study of the human body (which pertains to natural philosophy) from a medical physiology that concerns only health. Sec- ondly, I show that Regius’s notions of health, disease, temperament and medicaments were the product of a Cartesian interpretation of tradi- tional concepts, which was influenced by Santorio Santorio’s project of practicing medicine without occult elements. As a consequence, Regius’s classification of these notions is largely traditional. In conclusion, I show that Regius’s method of investigation in the area of natural philosophy consisted of a problem-solving procedure based on sensorial ideas. This approach can be traced back to Descartes, but was grounded on a purely empirical theory of knowledge, by which he rejected Descartes’s metaphysics. Regius’s order of exposition in natural philosophy and medicine, on the other hand, proceeds by defini- tions and divisions, and omits proofs. The reasons why Regius adopted this order were: 1) his rejection of Descartes’s metaphysical interpretation of physics, and 2) his wish to emphasize the conceptual clarity and continuity of natural philosophy and medicine